Showing posts with label Leslie Denison. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Leslie Denison. Show all posts

November 29, 2024

The Snow Creature.

Review #2319: The Snow Creature.

Cast: 
Paul Langton (Frank Parrish), Leslie Denison (Peter Wells), Teru Shimada (Subra), William Phipps (Lt. Dunbar), Lock Martin (the Yeti), Rollin Moriyama (Leva), Robert Kino (Inspector Karma), George Douglas (Corey Jr), and Rudolf Anders (Dr. Louis DuPont), Produced and Directed by W. Lee Wilder (#1599 - Killers from Space)

Review:
Sure, it made sense to try and give another shot to W. Lee Wilder, who couldn't have just been a hack director that so generously gave us Killers From Space, the movie with googly-eyed monsters that came out in the same year as this movie. Yes, after six relatively normal-sounding noirs and dramas, he had turned to sci-fi stuff with Phantom from Space (1953). So anyway, here we are with a creature feature movie that might as well be called "Shadows and Blah Blah". You might wonder how many movies exist where you don't really see the monster too much, and, well, there are a few that don't dwell too much on effects and go with the idea of "imagination in terror" or something to that extent. But this film, as written by Myles Wilder (no points to the guess of his relation to W. Lee) has only one apparent sticking point: it was apparently among the first in a string of "yeti" (okay, it's just bigfoot but cold) movies that would come across in the next few years (well there is a film called Pekka ja Pätkä lumimiehen jäljillä [1954] that was released in Finland as a Yeti-themed comedy but I'm sure Ishiro Honda's Half Human [1955] just came out of the blue). Clearly it led to inspirational movies such as Man Beast (1956), as made by Jerry Warren. Actually, Wilder wasn't done with the noirs, as his next film was The Big Bluff (1955) in a career that saw him do more movies that I'm sure will be fun candidates to return to in late November.

Sure, 69 minutes might seem short enough for a straight-to-the-point movie. But the easiest thing to say about the movie is that nothing actually happens in this miserable pile of boredom. It actually resorts to narration to help try and set up its scenario and manages to never get going, particularly since you barely see the creature in actual detail while going around with a pastiche of movies that it happens to make one yearn to watch with the "getting the creature from abroad onto America" in King Kong (1933) or the sewer-side climax from Them! (1954). But nothing will prepare you for the sheer amount of nothing that happens, even with a miniscule body-count and characters that seem to believe that they are the living embodiment of cardboard and should therefore talk as routinely as possible (gotta love how the unnamed Himalayan country has Japanese-speaking actors, who are probably more committed to worrying about the boogeyman creature than the others). People walk, talk in winded sentences (the idea of wondering where it should be in immigration services is thought about and forgotten) and so on and so on. Maybe Phipps is the highlight of a bad bunch, because he doesn't have to go around doing monologues (our hero at one point refers to the sherpas as being like "human mules"!), but it can't make up to a movie that because of its public domain status is usually found in languishing quality. The only thing to say about the creature is that it was played by Martin, a 7ft tall man who had appeared in The Day the Earth Stood Still (1951), who probably was as cramped in that "suit" as one is when watching the movie. The movie ends with silly jokes about someone becoming a dad because they were too wrapped up in the hunt to see their wife give birth...funny stuff. As a whole, the purses made by Wilder probably seem more tantalizing than seeing another one of his dull movies.

Overall, I give it 2 out of 10 stars.
Next up: Saturday, Saturday, Saturday! Viva Knievel!

October 1, 2024

The Return of the Vampire.

Review #2260: The Return of the Vampire.

Cast: 
Bela Lugosi (Armand Tesla), Nina Foch (Nicki Saunders), Roland Varno (John Ainsley), Frieda Inescort (Lady Jane Ainsley), Miles Mander (Sir Fredrick Fleet), Matt Willis (Andreas Obry), Ottola Nesmith (Elsa Walter), Gilbert Emery (Dr. Walter Saunders), Leslie Denison (Detective Lynch), and William Austin (Detective Gannett) Directed by Lew Landers.

Review: 
Believe it or not, I actually was trying to find time to do this film for quite a few years. Sure, it probably doesn't sound like much, what with the title being probably the most generic one could ever do...but it is Bela Lugosi playing a vampire again. Sure, Mark of the Vampire (as directed by Tod Browning in 1935) had you going with the idea of Lugosi as a lead vampire (until that twist), but, well, here you get the real deal. This is for a movie that is basically a discount version of Dracula (1931), complete with a subservient person that, uh, turns into a wolf. It was released by Columbia Pictures, who could be efficient in cheap B-moviemaking, which is probably evident pretty quickly here, complete with select stock footage shots (the climax involves WWII footage, take a guess what that means). The film was written by Randall Faye and Griffin Jay based on an idea by Kurt Neumann; Faye was a regular writer (and sometimes director) on plenty of cheap features from 1926 until he died in 1948. The movie was directed by Lew Landers, who actually had a handful of experience in horror as a journeyman director, as he went from actor to assistant director by the early 1920s before becoming a director of pretty much anything and anywhere, such as The Raven (1935), which also featured Lugosi as star (Landers would then shift over to TV by the 1950s prior to his death in 1962). It wasn't quite the last time Lugosi played a vampire, but further efforts were, well, comedies such as Abbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein (1948) and Mother Riley Meets the Vampire (1952). The movie was released in the same year as Universal's Son of Dracula and ended up being a decent hit.

You have to remember that Lugosi was basically typecasted after the success of Dracula (1931), particularly because of his Hungarian accent (of course by that time he was a naturalized US citizen). He couldn't get that many starring roles unless it involved horror or being with studios beyond Universal Studios. Chronic sciatica (and taking drugs to treat it that left him addicted) did not help matters for an actor that was relegated to doing stuff for studios such as Monogram Pictures. This was one of those rare times in the 1940s where he could actually do something as a star for a name studio, and I think he handled it confidently enough to make one want to see it as more than just a cheap Dracula imitation. Lacking the elegance befitting of the older film for something more akin to a creature of the night, he carries the film when required to do so to go with a movie that is generally paced well enough to let things go where they need to without overextending itself. Sure, it was made during the war, but there sure is something to making a vampire feature involving "bombing raids" with complete seriousness for a runtime of 69 minutes. Inescort and Mander prove suitable presences to do the investigative aspects required (the "vampire pursuit" is a bit cheekier when you consider the ending is addressing the audience!). Foch plays the object of pursuit patiently enough to make one go with the usual flow. Willis doesn't exactly have the werewolf makeup do him many favors, but the dilemma of a once-devotee is at least semi-compelling enough to view in the lens of trouble and toil to be free. I kind of like the idea of having a vampire tale told in two different war-time settings (the opening quarter of the film involves Emery and Inescort during 1918 putting a stake in the vampire only to inspire questions about putting a stake in a "living" person 25 years later!), complete with the vampire trying to impersonate a concentration camp escapee. It is the kind of brazen horror film that one can appreciate even as a clearly average movie, and the fact that Lugosi was there to lead the way rather than be trapped by a hokey foundation is a worthwhile thing to say when recommending a decent way to start the horror season.

Overall, I give it 7 out of 10 stars.
Welcome to October. It probably won't be as busy as last year's extravagant event, but we will try to cover plenty of new ground in horror, whether that involves sequels long awaited or remakes to go along with new directors and familiar ones. For example, the next review is Macabre and the one after that...is Leatherface: The Texas Chainsaw Massacre III.