Showing posts with label Joey Lauren Adams. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Joey Lauren Adams. Show all posts

August 25, 2020

Chasing Amy.


Review #1514: Chasing Amy.

Cast: 
Ben Affleck (Holden McNeil), Joey Lauren Adams (Alyssa Jones), Jason Lee (Banky Edwards), Dwight Ewell (Hooper X), Jason Mewes (Jay), Kevin Smith (Silent Bob), Ethan Suplee (Fan), and Scott Mosier (Collector) Written and Directed by Kevin Smith (#794 - Clerks)

Review: 
"The people that write about movies and talk about how important film is, and blah blah blah, it's ridiculous. Because at the end of the day, film's not important. What's important is kind of the simple things: Family, survival, life. Film is just entertainment."

It's easy to be drawn into film if you have an interest from a young age. Kevin Smith once described himself as "raised on television", but he had not truly thought about doing a film until he saw the film Slacker (1990), which interested him in how different it was from other films of the time in entertainment in its approach to characters. He decided to try and make his own independent film while looking up directors that had done work with less money to draw from that ranged from Jim Jarmusch to Spike Lee; he spent four months at Vancouver Film School before returning to his native New Jersey to work back at a convenience store. This proved the basis for his debut with Clerks (1994), which you may very well already know as the ultra-low budget comedy cult classic. His next film the following year in Mallrats crashed and burned with audiences, although it later developed a cult following in its own right.

Sometimes you just have to have a film about the hows and whys of a relationship, regardless of how good or bad the material turns out to be. Part of the inspiration for Smith to do this film (which he would also co-edit) was the experiences with his then-girlfriend Adams. I suppose the true enjoyment of the film comes from how much it resonates in biting humor about the absurdities that can come from relationships, whether as friends or more. What we perceive in our minds about people and the self-doubts that can come from it can shape who we are. Not everything has a bright beginning or ending when it comes to trying to find love and make it stick because of how you love someone, not who it is. This was the first breakthrough for Affleck, who had started acting as a child before moving into small roles in film (such as Dazed and Confused, which also featured Adams). He does fairly well here, having a confident vulnerability to him that generally can sell himself with useful nature. Adams proves just as (if not more so) interesting, having an alluring charm and good timing on certain moments to make the inevitable chemistry pop-ups work out as fine as they do. Skateboarder-turned-actor Lee makes for a snappy third for the proceedings, being pretty amusing in combative bonding. Ewell does fine, although it is his opening scene involving Affleck, Lee, and a convention speech that is his highlight moment. Mewes and Smith continue their double act from before with no sort of trouble in bumming a laugh and perhaps a bit of insight.

Honestly, I guess it really depends on how much experience one has when it comes to relationships like this, where one wonders how the perspective changes from say a bachelor viewer to a married viewer or even just someone with their own distinct fluidity. We are talking about a guy who pines after a "lesbian", after all. All I can think is the same thing I can think of "standard romcoms" that have their own little conflict in contrivances: Who really cares? Who the hell really cares about if your significant other had some experience before you and why does it matter to make a film about?. For all of its little moments of raunchy humor, it really isn't that much different from the clichés of before, right down to detailing personality at moments and beginning contrivances - one might as well be watching Annie Hall (1977) if they need an anatomy of neurosis at that point. I can appreciate taking on trying to do nuance with a romcom, but the mileage that it tries to drive itself with isn't really as deep as it thinks it is, existing on the idea that I really will just think this dilemma is just that meaningful and different from before - basically like window dressing up a comic book store. Whether it is sensitive or honestly raw enough to truly make for meaningful experiences is up to the viewer. On the whole, it is fairly decent, garnering some laughs with an ideal trio while making some of its connections count in perceptions and poignancy for a fair time.

Overall, I give it 7 out of 10 stars.

December 30, 2019

Michael (1996).


Review #1312: Michael.

Cast: 
John Travolta (Michael), Andie MacDowell (Dorothy Winters), William Hurt (Frank Quinlan), Bob Hoskins (Vartan Malt), Robert Pastorelli (Huey Driscoll), Jean Stapleton (Pansy Milbank), Teri Garr (Judge Esther Newberg), Wallace Langham (Bruce Craddock), and Joey Lauren Adams (Anita) Directed by Nora Ephron (#554 - Sleepless in Seattle and #1020 - You've Got Mail)

Review: 

It may have already been said before, but it bears repeating: some movies are just easier to write about than others. Some are involving pieces that can deliver on laughs while others can do that and a bit of romance. This is not quite one of those films, as it seems I have stumbled onto yet another mediocre Nora Ephron effort, although at least it isn't one with some sort of following (sidenote: this was a fair hit with audiences upon release). It is fundamentally a mediocre movie, wracked by middling humor that seems to be the work of too many cooks at writer (there are four credits for screenplay, one of them being the director) while also being too hokey when trying to inspire any sense of passion. Its one highlight is a lead performance from Travolta, an angel with a devil-may-care attitude that occasionally imparts wisdom.  He is eccentric enough to almost push this forward, but we're dealing with a road movie with otherwise empty others. That sure is a shame, because Hurt and MacDowell are capable actors, but it takes too much time to really build hints for a romance and it leads to a mild payoff that can't satisfy anyone. So they're both too cynical to open their hearts to love at first, big deal. The antics of its lead character almost seems enough for its own film without any attempts at comedy-drama, or even just a silly television movie. On the road with a fellow like its lead should be more interesting than what plays out here, aside from its one barfight scene and trips to random landmarks. The supporting cast is fine, but they aren't too special, mostly serving as one-hit wonders (such as a brash Hoskins) that carry the film with a mild relish (although the dog is cute, I guess). My expectations for this film were fairly middling, where I didn't think it would be a silly time or a particularly moving film - 105 minutes seems okay when it comes to mediocrity, I suppose. Once one gets behind the idea of Travolta playing a rascal from above (complete with wings), the possibilities could be endless (for hilarity or ridicule, you be the judge). It just seems a road movie isn't exactly what one has in mind (especially with how obvious its story beats are). Even a scene of a dog being run over doesnt have a pull, because one knows it's going to be reversed a few moments later anyway. If a film is about the journey and how it gets there, this is one where the journey seems to have a few too many dead ends. It needs more laughs and shocks to really pull something to the skies and above. At least this is the kind of film you could watch a few minutes on television without trouble -before either switching to find a better Travolta lead to view or going to sleep.

Overall, I give it 6 out of 10 stars.

April 6, 2016

The Break-Up.


Review #789: The Break-Up.

Cast
Vince Vaughn (Gary Grobowski), Jennifer Aniston (Brooke Meyers), Joey Lauren Adams (Addie Jones), Cole Hauser (Lupus Grobowski), Jon Favreau (Johnny Ostrofski), Jason Bateman (Mark Riggleman), Judy Davis (Marilyn Dean), Justin Long (Christopher Hirons), John Michael Higgins (Richard Meyers), and Vincent D'Onofrio (Dennis Grobowski) Directed by Peyton Reed (#728 - Ant-Man)

Review
A movie I had to watch for a Speech class? That's one good opening sign. To be clear, I had to do an assignment that dealt with stuff that happened in the movie that relates (for the most part) to what we are currently learning, such as the escalation (and de-escalation) stages of a relationship, and to the movie's credit it does at least fits the bill for an assignment and is reasonably something that could used a tool for at least some sort of learning.

It's a shame the movie isn't enjoyable as well. Yes, the movie does have a break-up, in fact it happens quite early on in the movie, a little over 20 minutes into it. Which means the rest of the time is dedicated to their attempts at trying to make the other move out of the condo they live in. This is such a miserable movie to watch mainly because not only do you know they won't get back together, you really just want the movie to end. The movie might've been better (if not at least slightly more tolerable) if it had waited longer for the two to break-up. All we really see of them before the breakup is them meeting at Wrigley Field (in probably one of the more weirder meet-cutes in recent record) and...a bunch of photos of them together over the opening credits, before the set up to their breakup. The vagueness of their happy relationship means that we never really get to care about the fact they break up. Seeing them bicker (And trying to get back at each other) is more tedious than mean-spirited, and while Vaughn and Aniston are at least passable leads, they can't save a movie that makes them feel so under developed, with only the latter seeming remotely close to being likable, and the latter barely edging towards likability near the end. The supporting cast isn't much better, barely ranging an emotional response from me that wasn't just a dejected sigh, save for D'Onofrio, who manages to be one of the only really interesting (if not weird) characters in an otherwise boring flick. Ulimately, everything seems so forced, and consequently I couldn't find myself to care about anything that goes on during the movie. The ending in which the two meet up a few months (or whenever) later and exchange pleasantries and regrets (compounded with a smile) just feels forced and (mercifully) is the final scene in an otherwise dreary movie that is neither memorable nor interesting. It is sometimes funny, but not enough to carry a movie.

But hey, at least it isn't Four Christmases.

Overall, I give it 5 out of 10 stars.