Showing posts with label Michael Medwin. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Michael Medwin. Show all posts

March 14, 2021

Street Corner.

Review #1652: Street Corner.

Cast: 
Peggy Cummins (Bridget Foster), Terence Morgan (Ray), Anne Crawford (Susan), Rosamund John (Sergeant Pauline Ramsey), Barbara Murray (WPC Lucy), Sarah Lawson (Joyce), Ronald Howard (David Evans), Eleanor Summerfield (Edna Hurran), Michael Medwin (Chick Farrar), Charles Victor (Muller), and Anthony Oliver (Stanley Foster) Directed by Muriel Box.

Review: 
"It was the heyday of the cliff-hanging serials, the one- and two-reel slapstick comedies, and the flickering newsreels. King Edward VII's funeral was the most impressive spectacle we had ever seen." 

Being known as one of England's most prolific female directors should be quite an accomplishment, particularly when doing so in an era as long ago as the 1950s and 1960s. Consider this: Box directed a dozen movies in her life-time, and no other female director has matched this accomplishment since. Muriel Box (born Violette Baker near London) wanted to be an actress and dancer (after developing a love for cinema as a child during World War I), but her failings led to other pursuits. In 1929, she started as a secretary at British Instructional Films. In 1932, she would meet (and soon marry) journalist Sydney Box, and they would soon work together in writing, such as with short plays. Being involved with film was quite a family affair for the Boxes, as Sydney's sister would also be involved with Verity Films, for which the three would be behind production over hundreds of wartime propaganda shorts after its inception in 1940. Muriel would direct for the first time with the documentary short The English Inn (1941). The Boxes would work together extensively in the decade with writing scripts alongside producing one-act plays. The Seventh Veil (1945) would be their greatest achievement in terms of screenplay. Their screenplay would win an Academy Award for Best Original Screenplay that year, which made Box the first woman to have won the award. It would spur Sydney to moved to head of production for Gainsborough Pictures while Muriel would do story department and Betty would be a lead producer. With The Lost People (1949), she received her first credit as co-director because of her work in post-production (the original director was Bernard Knowles), as she re-shot over half of the feature. The Rank Organization would close Gainsborough in 1949, and Betty would move to Pinewood Studios and become a noted producer in her own right, while Sydney would create London Independent Producers with Murial as one of the partners. Box set out to become a director with an adaptation of So Long at the Fair (1950) but star Jean Simmons (for some reason) insisted to Box being replaced. Regardless of the intrusion, in 1952, Muriel would do her first solo theatrical effort with The Happy Family, which she co-wrote with Sydney. Ultimately, Box would direct a dozen of films until her last one in 1964, which were characterized as low-budget mixes of comedy and drama despite facing doubts from those around her (one actress thought it would be "strange and uncomfortable" to have her as a director). Box was not ultimately finished doing work within promoting women, as she would co-found the first feminist publishing company in England with Femina in 1965.

This was her third theatrical effort, one that be characterized as part of her method of covering society through the roles of women - in this case, an episodic ensemble talking about female police officers. The film (also known as Both Sides of the Law) served as a compliment to The Blue Lamp (1950), a crime thriller that was quite notable for its social realism of the time. It is the kind of "torn from the headlines" movie, one with cooperation from the Metropolitan Police (incidentally, women were only allowed into the force in 1919). It isn't the kind of movie with fancy details as so much it is one that has a semi-documentary feel (complete with shooting in London) while involving vaguely connected stories about family disorder to go alongside mildly interesting drama that nevertheless still seems useful enough for a viewing for what it ends up doing in breezy entertainment. It isn't flashy or packed with grand memorability (such as the aforementioned Blue Lamp film, which inspired a TV series that lasted two decades), but it manages to do a quiet job in portraying the grind of the time with decent enough spectacle in careful pacing for 94 minutes. The main star is Cummins, the young Irish focus (of sorts, since 28 is the new 18, I guess) that has to carry tension with a bit of impulse shining through that keeps us curious for a role that could've been bent as simply one to scoff at. Morgan (who had a modest career sprinkled with "bad guy" roles) follows along as the alluring presence of shifty means that one could see making a good pull at someone's head (in a film with well-meaning cops and a few off-kilter people, he sticks out). Crawford and John (each near the end of their careers, as the former died in 1956 while the latter retired after one more film role) are our main focus in terms of the side of the police, and they carry the movie to where it needs to go in the business of procedural patience with fair charm - this isn't exactly the kind of role that needs devastating screen presences, merely someone who can play the role with that right sense of dutiful consistency. Summerfield makes up the secondary focus with her own shocking involvement with the police, somehow going from rescuing a kid from water while deserting the Army. She does fine with the role, slowly uncovering the layers as a reluctant hero with fair polish. There is another subplot involving a neglected child that also has its own little moments, but the sticking point is within Cummins and Morgan, particularly since one even gets to see a police dog take part of the carefully swift climax. As a whole, it is exactly the kind of film one could expect of a police drama of the 1950s from a British director - swift, fair to the point, and suitable to those who are curious for what it likes to say of the time. For Muriel Box, it serves as a fair and worthy achievement - quietly effective in performances over style with the budget and circumstances given that certainly merit consideration for one of England's most prominent female filmmakers for the time.

Next Time: While Joy Batchelor was a co-director on this film, it is still an intriguing one to consider, since it is the first British animated feature...Animal Farm.

Overall, I give it 8 out of 10 stars.

August 20, 2016

Spaceways.


Review #833: Spaceways.

Cast
Howard Duff (Dr. Stephen Mitchell), Eva Bartok (Dr. Lisa Frank), Alan Wheatley (Dr. Smith), Philip Leaver (Professor Koepler), Michael Medwin (Dr. Toby Andrews), Andrew Osborn (Dr. Philip Crenshaw), Cecile Chevreau (Vanessa Mitchell), and Anthony Ireland (General Hayes) Directed by Terence Fisher (#257 - The Curse of Frankenstein, #258 - Dracula (1958), #272 - The Hound of the Baskervilles (1959), and #469 - The Revenge of Frankenstein)

Review
Believe it or not, this film was co-produced by Lippert Pictures (named for Robert L. Lippert, who would lead Regal Pictures a few years later) and Hammer Film Productions; most of you may know the latter though their horror films, which have been featured a few times on the show. Both of the companies had a deal in which the former would distribute the latter's films in the US, and vice versa in the UK, with this filmed entirely in England. As fun as the title or poster may seem (if you're into that sort of thing), the movie is actually a murder mystery, with the main lead being suspected of not only murdering two people, but putting them into a rocket that is spiraling the Earth. Naturally, footage from Rocketship X-M (#618) is featured during scenes with the rocket, because sharing is caring. There's obviously a bit of dedication to featuring some technobabble and moderately entertaining effects (and a bunch of gauges!), which is somewhat marred by a barely interesting plot. The cast is adequate for the material, for better or worse. Duff and Bartok are moderately entertaining, but there really isn't that much in terms of energy that can help the movie, which trudges a bit in a mystery that only goes somewhere with less than 15 minutes to go, with a twist that works if you actually thought someone would stuff bodies into a rocket. If you're looking for some sort of British thrill that's only 76 minutes long, I guess this works for you. It's okay, but nothing too spectacular.

Overall, I give it 6 out of 10 stars.

December 7, 2014

Movie Night: Scrooge (1970)


Review #673: Scrooge.

Cast
Albert Finney (Ebenezer Scrooge), Alec Guinness (Marley's ghost), Edith Evans (Ghost of Christmas Past), Kenneth More (Ghost of Christmas Present), David Collings (Bob Cratchit), Michael Medwin (Fred), Paddy Stone (Ghost of Christmas Yet to Come), Frances Cuka (Mrs. Cratchit), Richard Beaumont (Tiny Tim), Laurence Naismith (Fezziwig), and Mary Peach (Fred's wife) Directed by Ronald Neame.

Review
Ouch, it's been a week since the last review. Sorry for the delay, but hey, December's a tough month. I celebrated my birthday on the 1st, then promptly was sick for the next three or so days. Colds are very annoying to deal with, but now I'm better and ready to get back into the circuit...with another film called Scrooge. If you're wondering how it's any different from the other films, this time we're dealing with a musical version of the tale (I guess at this point anything can be turned into a musical, even hockey.), with one small change from the novel. But hey, how's the movie? It's alright, I suppose. For a Christmas film, it's fine as it does have a good deal of spirit (Heck, it even has Santa-I mean Father Christmas in it. I'm just surprised that the store happened to be selling it in Scrooge's size rather then the fact that they were open on Christmas), and you do get the sense of warmth and fun. Albert Finney is the biggest highlight, especially given that he portrays Scrooge so effectively you barely notice him under all that makeup, which helps when focusing on how he ranges Scrooge's emotions, such as the flashback sequence, where you see his grief and his regret in the past; I especially like seeing the present Scrooge berating the younger one for his actions, which makes Scrooge out to be more than a miser. The songs and how they are sung, are debatable though. Sometimes they're good (Thank You Very Much is nice, I admit), but other songs aren't as good (Father Christmas isn't a bad song, it just feels long). The ghosts are fun to watch (Ghost of Christmas Present sounds more like a feasting buddy, but he at least gets the point across, so there), and Guinness does a fine job as Marley. The one scene in the movie that veers from the tale is at the end, when Scrooge sees his future in death...and in chains. Yep, Scrooge sees more than just his grave, he also sees his chain. It's an unnecessary scene; Having Scrooge only see his grave without anyone being sad for his death and having them cheer in the streets in more haunting than a sequence in "fire land", with rats. But ultimately the movie is fine, and it manages to have enough quirks to be a good telling of the tale.

Overall, I give it 8 out of 10 stars.