Mortal Kombat II.

Review #2538: Mortal Kombat II.

Cast:

Karl Urban (Johnny Cage; Indy Urban as young Johnny Cage), Adeline Rudolph (Kitana; Sophia Xu as young Kitana), Jessica McNamee (Sonya Blade), Josh Lawson (Kano), Martyn Ford (Shao Kahn), Ludi Lin (Liu Kang), Mehcad Brooks (Jax), Tati Gabrielle (Jade), Lewis Tan (Cole Young), Max Huang (Kung Lao), Damon Herriman (Quan Chi), Chin Han (Shang Tsung), Tadanobu Asano (Lord Raiden), Joe Taslim (Bi-Han / Noob Saibot), Hiroyuki Sanada (Hanzo Hasashi / Scorpion), Desmond Chiam (King Jerrod), Ana Thu Nguyen (Queen Sindel), and CJ Bloomfield (Baraka) Directed by Simon McQuoid (#1853 - Mortal Kombat [2021])

Review:

I honestly forgot that the last Mortal Kombat movie was five years ago (April 2021, which included a release in theaters and HBO Max, but I saw it the old-fashioned way: a year later, on the beloved DVD). The last movie (as based on the video game series developed by Ed Boon and John Tobias) dealt with a descendant of Hanzo Hashashi (look, I know that's a name, but that's just Scorpion) and unlocking the arcana of dragon marked folks while the Outworld gents of Shang Tsung tried to preemptively win that mythical tenth tournament in a row by just beating Earthrealm's champions in advance. The filmmakers did not include the character of Johnny Cage by saying he was a "giant personality" that would throw things out of balance, which is, well, probably a bit silly when talking about a video game adaptation about needing to win a couple of matches, but to shameless crib from my thoughts back then, I thought the movie was fairly serviceable for trying to appeal to the "people it wants to appeal" (whether that means fans of the games or action fans, I suppose). It didn't exactly make me want to play the games on a more consistent basis* (to say nothing of the stupidly named Mortal Kombat 1), but so it goes. McQuoid returned to direct while Jeremy Slater served as writer for the film, which was originally envisioned for a release in October 2025 that saw delays due to the SAG-AFTRA strike for a subsequent release this month. A third film is possibly in development.

It doesn't really prudent to compare it to those 1990s films with Mortal Kombat (1995) and Mortal Kombat: Annhilation (1997) (besides, Mortal Kombat II is R-rated). We've ditched arcanas and, for the most part, Tan as the lead focus for basically a fetch quest with amulets and a tournament for the "fate of the Earthrealm". So, yea, you get your pits, pools, portals and a disjointed level of storytelling that is stuffed to 116 minutes. Oh hell, this is my mind of average goofball kind of movie, what can I say? It definitely shares the flaws of the previous movie in terms of the evident qualities of flim-flam storytelling and a few decent moments of fatalities within a color scheme that probably would help to be a bit brighter. I suppose there's something to say about a New Zealander like Urban trying to play a guy that was originally a spoof of Jean-Claude Van Damme. Nah, not really, I don't really care about accents, I just go for the fun of seeing a goofy washed-up star that doesn't even win the first fight we see of him. Granted, he doesn't get the whole movie to show such effortless charm because the movie is basically split between him and Rudolph, but both are fairly serviceable to where the movie needs to go (more so with Urban, mainly because he proves that you really could just coast on just putting on some sunglasses). Intentional or not, Lawson has more of the fun than the group of McNamee-Brooks-Huang combined. Ford makes a suitable enough threat in terms of "look menacing while wearing a mask for basically the whole movie" level, which basically means you have to take it in the middle level between "totally serious" and "heh, what a goof" (oh but but you have to choose one or the other - no, not really). The fight scenes have varying levels of entertainment in them, whether that involves the Liu Kang-Kung Lao fight (probably is the one to highlight) or probably the Baraka fight if you prefer to see something in daylight. The thing is you are watching a movie that will have to figure out if they are going to create folks to get killed off or just go around doing resurrections (the aforementioned Lao and whatever the hell they will do after what you see in the ending) for the next one and I don't know how much patience one will have by that time. As a whole, it has a few ass-kicking moments and probably enough energy to make it over the finish line, one that specifically will work best for people who either like the video game series or perhaps select action fans who love slugfests of violence and gore. So it goes.

Overall, I give it 7 out of 10 stars.

Song of the day!

*This is more of a "nerd" thing, but I will say that it seems fun to play as Johnny Cage for say, the Kollection game that came out recently. Or Tanya, because oh yeah. What?

Mortal Kombat (2021).

Review #1853: Mortal Kombat (2021).

Cast: 

Lewis Tan (Cole Young), Jessica McNamee (Sonya Blade), Josh Lawson (Kano), Mehcad Brooks (Jackson "Jax" Briggs), Ludi Lin (Liu Kang), Max Huang (Kung Lao), Tadanobu Asano (Raiden), Chin Han (Shang Tsung), Joe Taslim (Bi-Han / Sub-Zero), Hiroyuki Sanada (Hanzo Hasashi / Scorpion), Matilda Kimber (Emily Young), Laura Brent (Allison Young), and Sisi Stringer (Mileena) Directed by Simon McQuoid.

Review: 

Mortal Kombat, if you remember correctly, is a series of video games created by Ed Boon and John Tobias that originally came out in 1992 that had its most memorable aspect involve "fatalities" for death scenes in a violent fighting game that attracted attention (the good kind, not just whiny parents who should know better); while I can't say I am particularly good at any of the games I have played (namely Armageddon along with the newest one), it does have a certain knack for clever gooey fun. As such, it made sense that a movie would try to capture that feeling of the video game. Mortal Kombat (1995) and Mortal Kombat: Annihilation (1997) were odd movies of their time, but at least the first one had something people would stick with on purpose when it came to interesting entertainment. Of course, they were PG-13 rated movies that toned down the level of violence seen in the video game franchise of the same name, but there had been ideas of trying to do another Mortal Kombat movie for years and years. There had been a handful of television and short films released in the time between Annihilation and this film in 2021 (such as the web series Mortal Kombat: Legacy in the mid 2010s). After a changeover of directors, Australian director Simon McQuoid was hired to direct in 2016 with a script being done by 2019. The script had multiple writers: the story was done by Oren Uziel and Greg Russo while the screenplay was done by Russo and Dave Callaham. It was Russo that thought of the storyline involving the new character of "Cole Young", using his own experiences as a soon-to-be father for this character.

Look, the 1995 movie wasn't exactly as faithful to the material, but I still found something to enjoy in its offbeat energy. Strangely enough, this movie decides on its own approach to supernaturally powered people kicking the hell out of each other with "arcana" alongside the aforementioned new character and a handful of references from the game (alongside a few from the original movie). Technically speaking, the movie is a more refined version of what one would probably expect from a video game adaptation - holding to some of the traditions established in previous material but also finding a way to make it accessible for movie form in engagement. Of course, the easiest thing to say about the movie is that it is perfectly average. Average, average, average, but at least the violence is up to what you expect in grisly bits without being a gore-show. It handles the fighting sequences with about the efficiency one would expect from a modern age movie, which is to say that those who like the skill presented by action choreography and effects will prove interest to those who care for it in the same way that a comedy provides a few chuckles if strained hard enough. The actors are hit and miss, but no one really steps under the mark, which is pretty much the same thing I said about the first film, really. The standards haven't exactly been raised very high in the 21st century for video game movies, so as long as one actually puts together comprehensible on paper, you should be fine here. Tan doesn't exactly have the most to do with the role, because he only barely justifies the idea of having a new character present when there are already oodles of people to go along with that seems better than "audience surrogate" that does exactly what is needed (I was mostly confused because I thought he was meant to be the next Scorpion, because, you know, he is his descendant); undoubtedly, one will be looking forward to the idea of seeing the character of Johnny Cage in a sequel, because God knows there is a personality begging to be shown as a lead there. McNamee has the spirited timing required to make a compelling piece of the puzzle of mildly interesting people, but the real star is actually Lawson, who provides the most chuckles in a smarmy role that has the most to do in drawing personality, which almost makes you wish for further interest into the character. Brooks and the others prove just fine for the small cadre of lines and personality bits that come from playing supporting characters (i.e., all of the other people in the square of the games) just fine, with one hoping for a bit more Asano the next time around. Han and Taslim make for useful adversaries to go alongside calm fury from Sanada. As a whole, it probably won't replicate the feeling of playing one of the games, but it does prove serviceable for the purpose required in trying to appeal to the people it wants to appeal. In other words, if your standards for having a decent time watching a movie seem to line up with this one, you will probably have it work out for you with useful satisfaction.

Overall, I give it 7 out of 10 stars.

Aquaman.

Review #1175: Aquaman.

Cast: 
Jason Momoa (Arthur Curry / Aquaman), Amber Heard (Mera), Willem Dafoe (Nuidis Vulko), Patrick Wilson (King Orm), Dolph Lundgren (King Nereus), Yahya Abdul-Mateen II (David Kane / Black Manta), Nicole Kidman (Atlanna), Temuera Morrison (Tom Curry), Ludi Lin (Captain Murk), Michael Beach (Jesse Kane), and Randall Park (Dr. Stephen Shin) Directed by James Wan.

Review: 
I will admit that I did have mild expectations for Aquaman, much in the same way that I try to hold for most superhero films, where I hope for some fine entertainment along with at least some sort of storytelling or substance. It isn't an exceptional film by any means, but it does have plenty of entertainment value and a fair bit of charm to make a solid feature with enough spirit of adventure to prevail. It fits squarely in the middle with other superhero films in recent years, being just as fine as other features such as Black Panther (2018) for example but also being particularly better made than other films adapted from DC Comics such as Justice League (2017). Honestly, the best way to make a superhero film is to just have fun with the material while not making a mockery out of what makes a hero what they are, while having interesting secondary characters to go with it. In that regard, Momoa is up to the task handily enough, giving plenty of dignity and charm while handling himself just fine for the action sequences. Heard does fine with her role, although the chemistry between her and Momoa isn't too noteworthy. The others in the cast stand to do their parts just fine, although having two villains in Wilson and Abdul-Mateen II seems a bit much. Lundgren seems to be having fun with his kingly role at least. The dialogue certainly doesn't help too much with giving these characters too much life, having more splashes of delivering exposition; in that case it is no wonder the film runs at 143 minutes, which can feel a bit long at times, although at least the action scenes do help to cover some of the slack. The film also has time for humor amidst the spectacle - where else can one see an octopus do a drum solo? Undeniably, the film hinges quite a bit on the execution of its effects, since a majority of the movie takes place underwater. For the most part, it looks fairly convincing, and I can only imagine the effort it took to make the actors seem like they were in water. The action works well, not being too jerky or blurry for the eyes. The climax is fine and dandy. The film has a bunch of people pulling the strings behind its execution in writing, with David Leslie Johnson-McGoldrick and Will Beall being behind the screenplay while Geoff Johns, Wan, and Will Beall are credited with doing the story for the film. On the whole, this proved to be a good fashioned crowd-pleaser kind of movie, doing what it aspires to do without too many bumps. The film works more often than not in trying to give its main hero a place for the big screen through good fun and a decently patched story that allows the possibility for more with this character that can only go up from here.

Overall, I give it 8 out of 10 stars.