Showing posts with label Michael Cudlitz. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Michael Cudlitz. Show all posts

July 8, 2022

Grosse Pointe Blank.

Review #1859: Grosse Pointe Blank.

Cast: 
John Cusack (Martin Q. Blank), Minnie Driver (Debi Newberry), Alan Arkin (Dr. Oatman), Dan Aykroyd (Grocer), Joan Cusack (Marcella), Jeremy Piven (Paul Spericki), Hank Azaria (CIA Agent Steven Lardner), Barbara Harris (Mary Blank), Mitchell Ryan (Mr. Bart Newberry), K. Todd Freeman (CIA Agent Kenneth McCullers), Michael Cudlitz (Bob Destepello), and Benny Urquidez (Felix La Poubelle) Directed by George Armitage.

Review: 
Yes, this was a movie script that was first written by a man who received an invitation to their 10th high school reunion. Michigan native Tom Jankiewicz worked as both an advertising copywriter, a substitute teacher and cashier when he was developing a script that would become this movie, which he started in 1991, which had a variety of characters that were based on people he had known (no, not the lead character). The script, when finally picked up for production, would feature re-writes that saw three people credited alongside Jankiewicz in the final version: John Cusack, Steve Pink, and D.V. DeVincentis. In the end, this was the only feature script that Jankiewicz would see made into a film, although he did serve as a script doctor on a handful of scripts while working primarily as an advertising copywriter and news-writer. In 2013, while participating in a question-and-answer session with college students about the movie, he collapsed and died; he was 49. Now, a film does need a solid director, which is where George Armitage comes into the picture, since Cusack sent him a copy of the script to see if he was interested. Born in Hartford with a move to California as a teenager, he started the road to filmmaking as a film fanatic who happened to study political science and economics at UCLA before being offered a mail room job at 20th Century Fox. He would do work for the studio on television while writing his first scripts in the mail room, most notably with Peyton Place. It was Roger Corman, who was there at the studio to make The St. Valentine's Day Massacre (1967), that helped inspire Armitage on his way to become a filmmaker, particularly his style of letting the actors improvise while getting his day in of shooting; he would write Gas-s-s-s (1970) for Corman (while also serving as an associate producer), and he was impressed enough to have Armitage direct his first film with Private Duty Nurses (1971). Armitage, when presented the script by the four writers, found himself having to guide them to cut down the script in pre-production in order to get it right for shooting (in a sense, he was doing un-credited script work, although he did not want to deal with the Writers Guild and their way of handling credits). It was shot three ways: the written version, a mildly understated version, and an over-the-top version, with the latter being generally utilized to go alongside actor improvisation. This was the fifth feature he directed in his career.

It's funny how you can make a movie about a morally flexible assassin trying to not satisfy their urge and end up having to do so anyway for a solid and clever movie, one that manages to get the finer points of what it really means to try and go home again. It is a coherent black comedy that rewards its viewer with solid characterization in the art of detachment and wry behavior that happens to also have a soundtrack by a member of the Clash. The strength comes from Cusack, wrapped in curiosity and well-placed timing in a character role that requires someone who can eke out something worthwhile in a mess of a character that isn't simply just a calm and collected mercenary. It all comes with the eyes of watching someone who has seen the other side of life and wants to come back, with a little bit of shooting on the side. Driver makes up the other part of the captivating chemistry that comes with the movie in passionate cynicism that has tried to re-invent themselves again and again only to find frustration and hesitancy, complete with sharing a kiss with Cusack from the get-go only to throw a mic on him to do on-the-air blasting in ten years of irritation. Of course, the other members of the cast lend a hand in curious charm, whether that involves Cusack and Cusack sharing brief scenes together or on the phone that matches stoic and chipper attitudes. Arkin makes a reluctant pairing with Cusack that results in a few good moments in the art of attempted conventional therapy. Aykroyd is enjoyably deranged here, making for a quality (union man) ham that makes a quality contrast to Cusack without overstepping him. The setup to get to the climax might be a bit convenient, but one could also find a variety of situations to be a series of convivences and coincidences, which it is really a dandy way of saying that some things are just fun enough to go with things. The 107 minute run-time makes for a pleasant breeze, one that carries its time back home with memories and long-gone people with select moments of action, most notably with a locker-room fight that is executed effectively. As a whole, Armitage and company cultivated a movie with plenty of lasting appeal that has not diminished in the 25 years that have followed the release of this film, one with capable wit and timing from its characters that make it a lingering classic worth checking out.

Overall, I give it 8 out of 10 stars.

May 24, 2018

Sex Drive.


Review #1088: Sex Drive.

Cast: 
Josh Zuckerman (Ian Lafferty), Amanda Crew (Felicia Alpine), Clark Duke (Lance Johnson), Seth Green (Ezekiel), James Marsden (Rex Lafferty), Katrina Bowden (Ms. Tasty), Alice Greczyn (Mary), Michael Cudlitz (Rick), David Koechner (Hitchhiker), Dave Sheridan (Bobby Jo), Mark L. Young (Randy), and Charlie McDermott (Andy) Directed by Sean Anders.

Review:  
Obligatory sports comment: Oh my stars, the Washington Capitals are actually going to the Stanley Cup, and it's against the Vegas Golden Knights. I hope that all of the games of this series will be entertaining, and I will be glad to see a team hoist the Cup for the first time ever. 

Oh look, a raunchy teen comedy. If you can believe it, the film is based off a book, named All the Way by Andy Behrens. In any case, what can one expect from a movie such as this? I didn't expect much from it, and I wasn't exactly disappointed. I was reminded of Superbad (#1032) in that the two films both had nerdy leads that were driven by their desire to become men, but it became pretty obvious quickly that Superbad was the better experience, having a good cast and a consistent pace that had a heart to it with confidence in what it wants to be. This film is just as crude as the other one (with a unrated cut that ups the ante), but it isn't as funny with its lewdness because it just isn't as clever. The cast is a mixed bag. Zuckerman is occasionally funny, but he can't really elevate his character towards anything too mildly interesting to follow through, which can also apply to Crew, who feels a bit lacking at times. Their plotlines just seem a bit too routine and a bit too boring to really generate much laughs. Duke is fairly amusing, however, having a confidence and swagger that gives the film some needed laughs at times. Green is also pretty amusing, having a biting sarcasm that certainly helps give the movie some sort of edge in his brief time on screen. Marsden also a few amusing moments with his swaggering character. The payoff and climax is what you (mostly) might expect, for better or worse.

The biggest problem with the movie is that it just isn't funny enough to really justify its own existence, raunchy or not. Even if you already know what's going to happen (with it's structure, anyway), there isn't enough with these characters and the gags to make something worthwhile from start to finish. Sure, there are some moments that are pretty interesting (such as the hitchhiker / radiator trouble sequences), but a good part of the time just feels a bit like going through the motions, whether through a four letter word or through some method. There exist two cuts of the film, with the original cut being 109 minutes long, while the "Unrated Cut" lasts 129 minutes, with the latter being what you would expect, which may be more enjoyable or painful, depending on your view of the film. It isn't a terrible experience, and it will deliver some cheap thrills, but it also is just a movie that will come and go just as quickly as it came.

Overall, I give it 5 out of 10 stars.