Showing posts with label Roy Laidlaw. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Roy Laidlaw. Show all posts

July 27, 2022

The Ace of Hearts (1921).

Review #1866: The Ace of Hearts.

Cast: 
Leatrice Joy (Lilith), John Bowers (Forrest), Lon Chaney (Farallone), Hardee Kirkland (Morbius), Edwin N. Wallack (Chemist), Raymond Hatton (The Menace), and Roy Laidlaw (Doorkeeper) Directed by Wallace Worsley (#850 - The Hunchback of Notre Dame (1923) and #1617 - The Penalty (1920))

Review: 
Admittedly, when I think of Lon Chaney, I do think of the times where he put some sort of elaborate makeup for dramas and the occasional horror flick. But there were countless other movies besides that involved Chaney for the silent era. So, yes, here we are with a silent romantic drama that happens to tread on familiar material. Remember The Penalty (1920)? As with that film, it is an adaptation of written material that was written by Gouverneur Morris, with his short story The Purple Mask being the basis for this film; this was also done at Goldwyn Studios, where Chaney worked for five films between his stints at Universal and MGM. The plot, if you want to know, involves a couple who got married because he got selected to dispose of a "The Man Who Has Lived Too Long" that will give him confidence, and Chaney's character happens to be part of the love triangle and part of an explosive climax, which results in a movie that lasts 75 minutes. Apparently, the original ending included a character that survived an explosion only to say how right it was about how the world needed love (i.e. construction rather than destruction), but Samuel Goldwyn balked at how preposterous it sounded. 

It is entirely possible that the secret society presented in this film was really something in 1921 to worry about when it came to censors, particularly with fears over anarchists. The effect is a movie that seems very amusing when not thinking about the context of the time, because hearing about a loosely defined society with people that look like a bunch of librarians who assemble to take down vague rich guys for ill-defined reasons is more amusing than the actual film itself. Simply put, the movie just isn't as interesting as one would hope, because its attempts at romance grind the movie down to a boring halt. It's incredibly predictable to see where the movie goes, because obviously a sudden romance is going to impact any chance of curiosity, even if it is attempted murder. Hell, I'll even accept a failed assassination, but the movie doesn't even lend that your way, as if the examination of just what the world needs through the eyes of "Cause" members gone good is enough (this isn't to say one needs an explanation for everything, because film doesnt need to do that, but even a BS try is better than zero). Hell, if these two are established members of the group-with-loosely-defined-goals, then the idea of them escaping to a new life would be horrifying, as if folks who sent out bombs to take out people can get a second chance just because they found love - the woman initially resisted marriage because of her devotion to the "Cause", so either she served as just a card shuffler or she got to do missions of death. You would actually want to hear more about just what is behind their desire to drive off these rich folks (again though, try doing that without stoking censorship) than hear more gobbledygook about the alleged chemistry between Joy and Bowers, who have as much energy together as two broomsticks that became sentient for ten minutes; they look at each other, and you look at your watch. Chaney is the highlight, but only because every other actor is on autopilot more appropriate for a mime show, as Chaney does manage to convey a slight bit of tragedy with sacrifice and loneliness. After all, what better way to show a lonely person than to have them stuck in the rain for hours before waking up to pet a dog on the steps. The final scene where he muses about getting the card that bears the title of the movie (marking him...to kill) is at least a decent one to close the movie out on, since one would hope to close all movies out with a bang. In conclusion, this is an average movie, lacking in true sentiment or meaningful depth besides an amiable effort from Chaney that makes for a century old clunker. In a sea of other choices where Chaney plays a man wrapped with dilemmas and self-sacrifice, you can do better.

Overall, I give it 6 out of 10 stars.

July 1, 2014

Movie Night: Back to God's Country.

Review #607: Back to God's Country.

Cast
Nell Shipman (Dolores LeBeau), Charles Arling ('Sealskin' Blake), Wheeler Oakman (Peter Burke), Wellington A. Playter (Captain Rydal), and Roy Laidlaw (Baptiste LeBeau) Directed by David Hartford.

Review
There are many notable people from Canada I didn't cover last year, such as Norma Shearer, Donald Sutherland, Seth Rogen, Dan Aykroyd (whose birthday is today), Michael J. Fox and even William Shatner, and so in honor of our neighbor from the north, I'm reviewing two movies having to do with Canada. 

The first is this film, the second oldest movie ever reviewed on this show, released nearly 95 years ago, and one of the earliest Canadian features, and the most successful silent film in Canada's history. Shipman helped to write the film (which was already adapted from a short story by James Oliver Curwood), and she stars in it as well. The movie lasts about 72 minutes, so it's a breeze to get through, and though the plot may be somewhat paper thin, it at least is enjoyable to watch, though a little music would have helped. The blue tint for night is good looking, and the scenery is nice, the cold near wasteland is fine for a film like this. Shipman is a fine hero to watch, and the rest of the cast is decent, this is overall a decent movie that while starting slow, does manage to entertain, and on Canada Day, I guess that's all that matters. 

Overall, I give it 8 out of 10 stars.
The next film will be Tomorrow Never Comes, stay tuned, as it will be posted in a few hours. Go...Blue Jays?
original image: