Showing posts with label Sarah Peirse. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sarah Peirse. Show all posts

August 31, 2025

The Navigator: A Medieval Odyssey.

Review #2416: The Navigator: A Medieval Odyssey.

Cast: 
Bruce Lyons (Connor), Chris Haywood (Arno), Hamish McFarlane (Griffin), Marshall Napier (Searle), Noel Appleby (Ulf), Paul Livingston (Martin), Sarah Peirse (Linnet), Mark Wheatley (Tog 1), Tony Herbert (Tog 2), Jessica Cardiff-Smith (Esme), and Roy Wesney (Grandpa) Directed by Vincent Ward (#627 - What Dreams May Come)

Review: 
"It's easy to get films made that are more generic. I want my films to be accessible, though I also want to do them on my own terms, and to be about my own concerns as a filmmaker."

Sure, of course New Zealand counts for World cinema, since they do manage to conjure up a few interesting directors and movies from time to time, particularly with this co-production between New Zealand and Australia. Vincent Ward was born in Greytown to a background of farmers (his father] had damaged hands from the war that still maintained his farm). He studied Fine Arts in university but ended up becoming a filmmaker in 1978. He made his feature debut with Vigil (1984) that had come from years of searching for ideal settings to film and in casting; the movie was the first of the country's type to get on the prominent festival circuit. Apparently, the impetus of the next film by Ward started when he tried to cross a German autobahn (a federal controlled-access highway system) and got stranded. Ward wrote the script with Geoff Gapple and Kely Lyons. Made over the course of ten weeks in 1987 with a look that had influence from the Middle Ages (the film utilizes certain shades when it is set in the present day when compared to the black-and-white medieval sequences) to go alongside elaborate shots, the movie only became reality when the Australian Film Commission gave partial funding when the usual way of tax breaks was rejected. Ward didn't exactly become a household name, although it was not really his fault. He was actually the first director tapped to direct Alien 3, as he wrote the treatment that was thoroughly beaten to hell in the final rendition. Instead, Ward followed the Navigator film with Map of the Human Heart (1993). His next batch of films came with What Dreams May Come (1998), River Queen (2005), and Rain of the Children (2008), with the latter being his last released movie. At any rate, he keeps busy with painting and video art.

Whether seen as a fantasy adventure or as seen as movie of keeping one's faith under all circumstances, it is a pretty curious movie that is far more than, well, travelling through time (or do they...). Dream land or not, the atmospheric qualities of the movie come out pretty well in showing the wacked world of a place closed off (in some way) from certain people (one is in 1348, the other, well, in the 20th century), as one does when involving New Zealand, I suppose. It isn't so much that the modern world would look spooky to someone from an older time: nay, it (be it a highway full of many lanes) would look downright hellish, and it really is a bit of destiny to hold it all together for the plight of God and for themselves. The ragtag ensemble is pretty good in conveying the foibles and lingering destiny, mostly on the shoulders of McFarlane, who actually didn't become a regular actor (instead favoring being an assistant director in films and TV), but it is true that they have a wide-eyed appeal here that works for those who understand the zeal that comes in youth. It also reflects well on Lyons (who acted in just one other film), who actually was thought of in mind by one of the co-writers (K.Lyons, who he was married to). It just so happens that the ordinary can look extraordinary in the faces of youth, and that works out to make the ending all the more ironic. It is a moody film that does look really nice while conveying a sense of adventure with its own playing of time and imagery, which does make the 93-minute runtime go off without too many hitches. As a whole, its a movie that reminds one that some folks really believe that faith can override anything, rationales be damned.
 
Overall, I give it 8 out of 10 stars.

August 19, 2020

Heavenly Creatures.


Review #1507: Heavenly Creatures.

Cast:
Melanie Lynskey (Pauline Parker), Kate Winslet (Juliet Hulme), Sarah Peirse (Honora Parker), Diana Kent (Hilda Hulme), Clive Merrison (Dr. Henry Hulme), Simon O'Connor (Herbert Rieper), and Jed Brophy (John) Directed by Peter Jackson (#1486 - Bad Taste)

Review: 
"I was reading the script in the back of the car and I turned to my dad and yelled, "I've GOT to get this!". And he replied, "Then you will." And I thought, "Yep, that's it. I'm bloody well going to." And that was it. I was so determined."
"I always thought I'd be in New Zealand doing theater. Everything I've done is greater than my greatest dreams."

It's easy to do a fascinating film about history when it happens in your back yard, or shall we say in the Fourth World. This was the debut performance for both Lynskey and Winslet, with each having been picked after hundreds of auditions for each role and both having acted from a young age (each appearing in plays from a young age along with Winslet appearing in television). This proved an important development for Jackson, who had primarily done horror-comedy films before this (with Braindead being released two years prior). It was his partner Fran Walsh who brought the idea of doing a film about the murders, interested in the obsessive relationship of Parker and Hulme that ended up in one of the most infamous murders that gripped New Zealand in the 1950s. A large majority of the filming would be done at authentic locations in New Zealand, including Victoria Park where the events of that day of June 22, 1954 occurred. Jackson and Walsh did research on the story through interviews with people who knew about Parker and Hulme (both of whom had since long been living under different names) along with utilizing diary entries that the former had written about the friendship.

Ultimately, what we have here is a strikingly fascinating film, careful in its depiction of its outcast focuses with the right sense of understanding and tension to make a riveting psychological drama. Jackson and Walsh deserve credit for not springing into sensationalism or broad generalization, instead going for a sort of surreal treatment within its mixing of reality and fantasy that makes a sort of haunting growth story. The secret weapon of the film is the effects from WETA Limited, utilized to show the fictional kingdom of Borovnia in their latex plasticine glory for the fantasy sequences among other moments such as a morphing garden. It makes a world one could see perhaps sacrificing for in its mythic imaginative quality. In terms of performances, Lynskey and Winslet obviously prove up to the challenge. Lynskey serves herself with a quiet and sort of unassuming intensity, one that drives us in interest over what she is really thinking and saying in the contrast of her life with her parents compared to the growing world of imagination and other passions with her one true friend, which we can find palpable even while batting an eye at the extent of their fantasy. Winslet fits the other side of the coin with flourish and vulnerability that has a great deal of conviction within a role that would've proved challengingly shaky to get a hold of for a weaker actress but feels like putty for Winslet to make for brilliant obsession. They have an interesting bond with each other that springs along with efficiency in displaying their unusually strong bond that deals within macabre romanticism like sisters, which naturally makes the decision at the end all the more frightening. Peirse and Kent round the contrasting corner in parenting, doing well in showing the difference in their treatment of their offspring that lends plenty of repressed curiosity that makes for good tension that isn't one-dimensional. On the whole, what we have here is a fascinating period drama that builds its dark sensibilities with a good deal of understanding and determination that sticks out from what could have been a pure true crime flick, making a clear portrait of troubled imagination come out quite clear for a winner.

Overall, I give it 8 out of 10 stars.