Showing posts with label Will Poulter. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Will Poulter. Show all posts

May 8, 2023

Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3.

Review #2006: Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3.

Cast: 
Chris Pratt (Peter Quill / Star-Lord), Zoe Saldaña (Gamora), Dave Bautista (Drax the Destroyer), Karen Gillan (Nebula), Pom Klementieff (Mantis), Vin Diesel (Groot), Bradley Cooper (Rocket Raccoon), Will Poulter (Adam Warlock), Sean Gunn (Kraglin), Chukwudi Iwuji (the High Evolutionary), Linda Cardellini (Lylla), Nathan Fillion (Master Karja), Sylvester Stallone (Stakar Ogord), and Maria Bakalova (Cosmo) Written and Directed by James Gunn (#626 - Guardians of the Galaxy and #932 - Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2)

Review: 
"In the end, my love for Rocket, Groot, Gamora, Star-Lord, Yondu, Mantis, Drax, and Nebula—and some of the other forthcoming heroes—goes deeper than you guys can possibly imagine, and I feel they have more adventures to go on and things to learn about themselves and the wonderful and sometimes terrifying universe we all inhabit."

Admittedly, the first Guardians of the Galaxy (as adapted from the second incarnation of the comic series of the same name, which was created by Dan Abnett and Andy Lanning) was a nice surprise when it came out in theaters in 2014. Sure, the Marvel push for a cinematic universe was already nine films in when it came out, but it wasn't hard for me to be surprised that a director I had not heard of managed to make a really neat adventure. Who wouldn't want something that sounds like a space epic ensemble? Of course, it's hard to not respect a director who also writes their own stuff, as was the case with James Gunn's prior two films with Slither (2006) and Super (2010). It set up other possible ideas for, well, other things, but the important thing that I remember most is that it had a sense of effervescent fun to it that was interesting without running into a joke just for the sake of it, with Gunn having an evident appreciation for these characters. The second film, released in 2017, was probably a sidestep direction in quality, but it did exactly what was required from a sequel in consistency (besides, as a resident Kurt Russell spokesman, I enjoyed him playing a villainous planet - such is life). Six years and appearances in varying quality and quantity (Avengers: Infinity War (2018), Avengers: Endgame (2019), Thor: Love and Thunder (2022), and The Guardians of the Galaxy Holiday Special (2022) - look I can't watch everything), here we are with a third and final film with this dynamic of Gunn and company. Oh, and it is one of the films in Phase F-Oh hell, if you care about cinematic universes (or making fun of streaming like I do), go ahead, I'm just here for the fun.

I suppose the quality of the film depends on just how much imagination one has in comparison to the director when it comes to seeing the culmination of various stories that have come with these characters over the past nine years. As the longest of the three films at 150 minutes, it tries to cover as many bases as it feels it needs to do in the idea of finding new horizons without turning into the longest group hug ever, complete with stakes that are more emotional than grand. In short: it is a clever way to tie things around when it comes to the stories of these characters without making it a goodbye show or just a vehicle of over-spectacle. It does have a few moments that could be considered disturbing, but one will likely be ready for anything if they have seen enough films with the middle-ground rating of "PG-13", you might say (personally, I fall on the side of not criticizing movies that dare to push a bit when it comes to that rating that lets the audience decide rather than go trying to recommend coddling, but whatever). Besides, if you can handle the influx of staged sequences of action where people are getting beaten a bit, I think you can handle animals in a cage. When it comes to performances, each get their own respective moments to shine besides the influx of scenes spent with talking animals (these scenes of Rocket are voiced threefold, incidentally, with Cooper doing adolescence, S. Gunn doing the young version, and Noah Raskin doing him as a baby) that loops right in to one last ride for a number of folks. Of course, the fact that Gillan has had an arc that saw her go from a second-tier adversary in the first film to an actual fledged member of the team with worthwhile time to follow along with in levity that fits quite well. Bautista, to the surprise of nobody, still provides the warmth required to balance the ensemble in timing and physicality in what makes for a worthy endnote (who among us would want to put on so much makeup forever, I suppose), which naturally makes for amusing banter with Klementieff and her useful timing again. Cooper carries the film along with pathos that makes it more than just a voice on motion-captured animation, one that makes it clear just how integral he has been to the series. The flashback sequences build that climax to where it has to go, and Cooper helps that make sense. Saldana does fine in essentially playing the straight one among the folks (while reminding of the middling idea of resurrecting her character from the dead in the first place), while Pratt holds his own with self-interest and charm, one that reminds me that just knows how to time things with general presence. Poulter makes for an amusing adversary when it comes to the mannerisms that come from a flying gold painted, uh, doof. 

Do I regard the movie as the best of the three? Well, that is an interesting point of discussion, because it probably has the best villain of the three films, that is for sure. Iwuji plays it exceedingly well in the art of irredeemable villainy that is compelling to see in all of his brilliant decadence without any ploy of sympathy or false note, which is necessary when it comes being more than just a villain who likes to pick on animals. His pursuit of perfection in the face of reality and the things around him is far more interesting when it feels in sync with no pretenses (so yes, sometimes you can have villains who might seem sympathetic, but this is not one of those days, thank heavens). It is a movie with worthwhile staging when it comes to action (such as one longshot scene) along with dialogue that works in tandem with the music choices to make a vibrant film that is more a resolution to new things rather than just a definitive be-all end-all film, which leaves the folks in a comfortable spot without playing it too safe (aside from maybe one post-credits scene). In the end, the movie is pretty good in the ways you would expect from a third film in a series that closes the loop on what had started in 2014 that will make most of the folks happy (or sad if you really get into it) with what they've seen over the years, whether that is warm enjoyment in the characters or in general.

Overall, I give it 8 out of 10 stars.

July 11, 2019

Midsommar.


Review #1244: Midsommar.

Cast: 
Florence Pugh (Dani Ardor), Jack Reynor (Christian Hughes), William Jackson Harper (Josh), Vilhelm Blomgren (Pelle), Will Poulter (Mark), Ellora Torchia (Connie), Archie Madekwe (Simon), Anna Åström (Karin), Mats Blomgren (Odd), Tomas Engström (Jarl), Gunnel Fred (Siv), Isabelle Grill (Maja), and Hampus Hallberg (Ingemar) Written and Directed by Ari Aster (#1099 - Hereditary)

Review: 
I went into this film with a few reservations, not so much because it seemed like an unsettling horror film, but moreso because I really did not want to build much anticipation for an offbeat experience that was going to last 147 minutes and come from a director that made an uneven debut movie that a bunch of people really embraced. At least I can say that this one is easier to recommend, if only because it actually feels like a whole experience of creepy horror. It has a great deal of craftsmanship in being unsettling, and I do very much applaud an attempt at folktale horror, even if it meanders a bit too long in actually driving the scares forward. Aster had initially rejected the pitch of studio executives to make a Sweden-set slasher film because he didn't think he a way into a story, although he ultimately based it around the disintegrating relationship of the two main characters as the main central conflict due to him experiencing a difficult breakup. Then again, he apparently had an original cut of the film that lasted over three hours, so perhaps this is a film that really does just want to take its time in getting me to care about said couple and their problems, which is more of a hit-and-miss type. I'm more focused on wondering if the main group of characters are ever going to figure out what is really going on with this commune dressed in white that has creepy drawings and sacred yellow triangle temples. The answer to that does tend to get lost in the shuffle with a bunch of creepy images and moments, which surely shine better than the drama between Pugh and Reynor, although they certainly prove their worth with their performances when needed. The others do their parts just fine, such as the folks in the commune being as assuring and observable up to a point.

Perhaps others really do care enough about how this relationship withers and withers through two hours, but time is better spent looking at how bright everything looks alongside camera warps and some interesting splatter shots. What film other than this has a sequence where it is shot upside down before gradually coming back to right-side up? It certainly is one of those "is this really happening?" type of movie, ranging from the obvious to the absurd, which will play differently for whatever mindset you're in, whether involving a certain ancient ritual or a certain sequence involving passion and plenty of weird imagery. The laughs do come out a bunch of times, whether intentional (such as with Poulter) or not, so at least the film isn't taking itself completely seriously all the time. Honestly, I was fine with what I got to see on screen, but it really is a case of inevitability - how much can you really show before it becomes too much to bear? Horror is what I sit for, with drama taking a backseat - sometimes you really need to get to the point without making patience become a tired virtue, where weirdness runs rampant. At least I can say this isn't a horror tale that gives you whiplash when it comes to actually delivering the parts - which it does enough to outweigh its burden of overwhelming itself with breakup/revenge fantasy as opposed to just toeing the slasher film standards. At least I can say this wasn't some limited release that only went to art-house theaters (the most obvious place this film belongs to) and nowhere else. Let all the movie-going folk encounter a curious offbeat film to stick out from the other types of fare, I say. Maybe you'll love it, maybe you'll hate it, but I sure am curious to see exactly where Aster can go from here.

Overall, I give it 7 out of 10 stars.