Showing posts with label Jack Thompson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jack Thompson. Show all posts

July 19, 2023

Flesh and Blood.

Review #2046: Flesh and Blood.

Cast: 
Rutger Hauer (Martin), Jennifer Jason Leigh (Agnes), Tom Burlinson (Steven), Jack Thompson (Hawkwood), Fernando Hilbeck (Arnolfini), Susan Tyrrell (Celine), Ronald Lacey (Cardinal), Brion James (Karsthans), Bruno Kirby (Orbec), Simon Andreu (Miel), John Dennis Johnston (Summer), Marina Saura (Polly), Kitty Courbois (Anna), Jake Wood (Little John), and Nancy Cartwright (Kathleen) Directed by Paul Verhoeven (#002 - RoboCop, #632 - Total Recall, #1922 - Starship Troopers)

Review: 
"The triangular relationship [of] Martin–Agnes–Steven is now the main story line, but in retrospect I think we should have stuck with Hawkwood and Martin. The failure of Flesh and Blood was a lesson for me: never again compromise on the main story line of a script."

Admittedly, it is probably easy to forget that the second phase of Paul Verhoeven's career that saw him leave his native Netherlands started with Flesh and Blood (1985). He started making films in the 1960s, with only a spell in the Royal Dutch Navy in between this, and it was his efforts in directing the television series Floris (featuring Rutger Hauer as the star) in 1969 that was set in the early 16th century during the country's Guelders Wars that took inspiration from earlier TV programs such as Ivanhoe. Business is Business (1971), his first feature, wasn't successful, but Turkish Delight (1973), featuring Hauer, still ranks among one of the most famous films made in the country. Hauer and Verhoeven would work together for three of the next four films that the latter made in the Netherlands, which included another famous film with Soldier of Orange (1977). Anyway, after 1984, Verhoeven had received offers from Hollywood to direct but was debating whether it was necessary to leave his native country. As such, he described this film as a "compromise", one that was shot in Europe that was a multi-country production with primary funding by Orion Pictures. Originally, the film was to be about the gradual disintegration of the friendship between the characters ultimately played by Hauer and Thompson. However, the producers pushed introducing a love interest within the character of Leigh that would create a love triangle (Hauer-Leigh-Burlinson), which he went with, much to later regret, although the ensuing troubled production did not help matters. Gerard Soeteman, who had developed the aforementioned Floris and had written a handful of scripts such as Turkish Delight, co-wrote the film with Verhoeven. Made on a budget of $6.5 million, an absolute shoddy promotion effort by Orion led to the film being a flop with audiences.

Wait a minute, people didn't go for this kind of film? A film set in the Middle Ages (1501) that is thrust with plenty of unwieldly characters involving swordplay and wonderful design? It might not have the most conventional of leads to follow, but who the hell cares? Granted, medieval fantasy can be one to favor in entertainment with good ol' swordplay, but with the right execution, you can lend a dose of reality to that hodgepodge, especially with Verhoeven and his approach to violence. In other words: death will happen in the Middle Ages, and it will rarely happen naturally. Well, that, and folks love God. This was the fifth and final film collaboration between Verhoeven and Hauer. During production, the two had such a disagreement with how the lead was supposed to be played that it led to a rift in which they never worked together again, because the former favored moral ambiguity while Hauer did not wish to play such a scoundrel given that he was just breaking into more mainstream features (such as The Osterman Weekend (1983), for example). While I can certainly see Hauer's point, time has clearly favored Verhoeven. The moral ambiguity that Verhoeven aims for when making a Middle Ages tale of such odd people is especially right for Hauer and his rough exterior to make a useful rogue rather than if he had tried to play it with any sort of heroic bent. He is supposed to lead this band of undesirables, and he leans into it with great conviction that is a brute through and through to the worthiest endgame. Verhoeven obviously had an interest in showing a confident woman with convictions that want to go anywhere to get their goal, as represented by Leigh. Consider how she handles her first scene where she consults her maid-in-waiting (Cartwright) about how one, well, has sex. She watches for a bit and then goes to hit her to put it to a stop. The way she deals with both Hauer and Burlinson is exquisite in its cat-and-mouse game of who ends up playing who, one who sells the act as more than a mere observer. Burlinson is undoubtedly the lesser of such a lofty triangle, but being warped by the mesh of trying to seek reason in a world that desires swift retribution does at least make for some sort of interest. I can't imagine the disappointment that could come from Thompson in going from a potential lead to basically support, but he at least makes a worthy character presence that obviously merits curiosity (I should mention his name happens to be the same as a 14th century mercenary leader). I enjoy the atmosphere of the film, because it never betrays the ambition in 126 minutes to make a suitable tale of, well, flesh and blood mixing for craven desires that deserved better marketing. The film doesn't skimp on the brutality that obviously had to happen in a time like this, and it reflects well that one enjoys the supporting cast for as long as they can. The real adversary is the ambition for the flesh to draw blood and not have it be their own, regardless of if the rich person happened to be sending someone off to do their battles for them or not. As a whole, it is a triumph of a movie in excruciating grit, one that dares to show the flesh and blood of the Middle Ages with wonderful design and devastating consistency for a brutally good time.

Overall, I give it 9 out of 10 stars.

May 16, 2018

Redux: The Man from Snowy River.


Redux Review #032: The Man from Snowy River.

Cast: 
Tom Burlinson (Jim Craig), Sigrid Thornton (Jessica Harrison), Kirk Douglas (Harrison / Spur), Terence Donovan (Henry Craig), Tommy Dysart (Mountain Man), Bruce Kerr (Man in Street), David Bradshaw (Banjo Paterson), Jack Thompson (Clancy), Tony Bonner (Kane), June Jago (Mrs. Bailey), and Chris Haywood (Curly) Directed by George T. Miller.

Review: 
On March 26, 2011, I reviewed this film as part of Season Two of Movie Night. Over seven years later, I have decided to do a Redux Review as part of a venture to revitalize certain reviews of the past and make them better in terms of their words and rating, which has evolved in some part since I was 14 as opposed to now. The original review wasn't even 100 words when I wrote it, so it is evident that this film deserves a re-look. Enjoy.

It is interesting to watch this film again, having not touched it since watching it with my dad in 2011. I described it as a film that had good acting (particularly from Kirk Douglas) that worked as a family film being comfortable being what it is. The film is an adaptation of the 1890 poem of the same name by Andrew "Banjo" Paterson, who is held in esteem to where he is on the Australian ten-dollar note, among other honors (including even being depicted in the film). This was the second adaptation of the poem, with the first being a 1920 film that also was an Australian production, although this movie is now lost. Obviously the film added aspects in its transition from poem to film, namely by having more characters and giving the title character a name - but that doesn't hurt the film in any sort of discernible way. This was filmed near the Victorian High Country in Australia, and the imagery is certainly beautiful to look at due to the cinematography by Keith Wagstaff. On a technical level, the film is wonderful, with the sets certainly selling themselves well. The horse action, particularly in the climax, is mesmerizing to watch, with Burlinson doing his own horse riding stunts. The most famous shot is one where he and the horse go over a cliff at a full gallop down, and that is something to behold, particularly since horse action isn't something you can't really fake. In any case, the chase at the end is exciting to watch. The main theme by Bruce Rowland is a particular standout, having a grace to it that I appreciate very much. The theme has been utilized for golf events and Rowland himself composed a special version of the theme for the 2000 Summer Olympics opening ceremony held in Sydney, Australia.

The acting performances are fairly well-done. Burlinson proves to be capable in his performance, having a fair sense of determination to him in his pursuit that comes off pretty convincingly. Thornton also proves pretty fair in her role; the romance between the two isn't too passionate, but it is at least convincing enough to make for a few interesting moments. It should be noted that Burt Lancaster and Robert Mitchum were considered for the dual role prior to Kirk Douglas signing on to portray Harrison and Spur. In any case, Douglas pulls it off pretty well, handling both characters with their own kind of personality without being too hammy. The rest of the cast do alright in their time on screen. As a Western, it has a plot structure that follows along the lines that you might expect (particularly with the romance), but the film earns its adventure and triumph through its execution and how it handles its story with enough care. At 102 minutes, the run-time is fairly paced, having a decent pace that never becomes too boring. Sometimes it feels a bit like a TV production, which makes a bit of sense given the TV background of some of the filmmakers such as Miller and John Dixon (who served as writer for the movie), but it all stays consistent enough to feel authentic enough without much distraction, whether for oneself or for families. This is a fair gem in a frontier of dramas and Westerns.

Thank you to you fellow readers who took the time to read this review. The decision to revise the rating is one made out of honesty and care for the system of doing rating decisions. Thank you for your consideration.

Next review: The Man from Snowy River II.

Overall, I give it 8 out of 10 stars.