Showing posts with label Mickey Rooney. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mickey Rooney. Show all posts

May 12, 2020

It's a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World.

Review #1413: It's a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World.

Cast: 
Spencer Tracy (Captain T.G. Culpeper), Edie Adams (Monica Crump), Milton Berle (J. Russell Finch), Sid Caesar (Melville Crump), Buddy Hackett ("Benjy" Benjamin), Ethel Merman (Mrs. Marcus), Dorothy Provine (Emmeline Marcus-Finch), Mickey Rooney (Ding Bell), Dick Shawn (Sylvester Marcus), Phil Silvers (Otto Meyer), Terry-Thomas (Lt. Col. J. Algernon Hawthorne), Jonathan Winters (Lennie Pike), Eddie "Rochester" Anderson (a cab driver), Jim Backus (airplane owner Tyler Fitzgerald), William Demarest (Aloysius, Chief of the Santa Rosita Police Department), Jimmy Durante ("Smiler" Grogan), Peter Falk (a cab driver), and Paul Ford (Col. Wilberforce) Produced and Directed by Stanley Kramer (#139 - Guess Who's Coming to Dinner, #228 - Inherit the Wind, and #1402 - On the Beach)

Review: 
"Why do actors think they're so goddamn important? They're not. Acting is not an important job in the scheme of things. Plumbing is."

I have seen a few films that have had big ambitions before, but this one certainly takes the cake any day. There aren't as many films as bold to utilize such a cavalcade of comedians and actors as this one, and it only seems fitting that such bold action would be taken by a director with a keen eye for tough subjects. This was the seventh of fifteen films directed by Stanley Kramer, who wanted to make "the comedy to end all comedies", which stands in contrast to the films done before and after this one. It was part of a string of noted hits for Kramer that took place in the 1950s and 1960s, although his popularity would later wane as a reflection of the times, and he would muse about the changing times for filmmaking, describing technique as cover for a "multitude of sins". It was written by William and Tania Rose, with the former being known for scripts such as The Ladykillers (1955) and Guess Who's Coming to Dinner (1967). This was filmed in widescreen through Ultra-Panavision 70, a widescreen process that could be filmed with one camera (as opposed to Cinerama and its three) that could be projected on a Cinerama screen. For such a large film, it is amazing to note the fact that it doesn't even exist in the way it was originally screened. The original cut was 210 minutes, but it eventually was cut to 192 for the premiere. It then was cut to 161 for theatrical release, reportedly to fit in more screenings. However, restorations were done in recent years to try and get close to the intended vision by Kramer, with a 1991 cut running 183 minutes that had footage found in a warehouse set to be destroyed. A restoration was done with the approval of Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer that was released by Criterion Collection in 2014 that tried to reconstruct and restore the footage (which is derived from 70mm) that runs at 197 minutes, which also includes an overture and intermission (if one is into that sort of thing). It's interesting to see how the footage looks in contrast to the normal footage, whether as little bits by parts already in the film or as audio-only parts or parts that have Asian subtitles superimposed onto the print. 

In a normal film, one could make a comedy jell with one duo and a group of supporting characters, but this is one with multiple pairings and supporting characters, complete with their own versatile backgrounds. One could start with the comedienne/TV star/clothing designer Adams, or perhaps talk about the long-time comedian in show business of clubs, film, radio and television for eight decades in Berle, or TV pioneer stars in Caesar and Silvers. In a film of excess, why stop at those mentions? One can't forget about comedian character actors like Winters, Thomas, and Shawn or an esteemed singer of musical comedy stage in Merman to go along established actors of the Hollywood Golden Age like Rooney and Tracy (who at this point in his life and career could only film for four hours a day due to failing health, with this being his penultimate film before his death in 1967). One has to stop at that point, since you can't go on and on to note the importance of cameo appearances that range from Jack Benny to Buster Keaton to the Three Stooges to Don Knotts. Really one could summarize the performances by separating them into tiers, with Winters and Thomas making up the first one, the second goes to Berle, Caesar, and Silvers, the third goes to Hackett, Rooney, and Merman, and the fourth being Shawn, Adams, and Provine. This certainly seems to be a film where people enjoyed themselves, where one doesn't have to wonder if the best moments are by the smallest parts or wonder if someone is chewing the scenery too much (they all do). There are gags that pile on other gags that can and will be drawn out to the longest point imaginable. Tracy doesn't even encounter the others until about two hours in (one does not exactly think about things like time and pacing with something like this, really). He does a fine job in serving for some small gags and plot details with care expected of his natural versatility. Perhaps the only fitting way to note the gags and which ones work best is to do a list, so here are five highlighted ones:

1. The Three Stooges (comprised of Moe Howard, Larry Fine, and Curly Joe DeRita), dressed up as firemen with axes that don't say one word but drive a laugh regardless from the fact that they are there.
2. A masterful destruction of a gas station by Winters, with Marvin Kaplan and Arnold Stang being present as people to be pushed around all of the equipment that ends with one great big collapse.
3. The ladder sequence for the climax, which had help in animation from famed effects man Willis H. O'Brien (who died before the release of the film), a captivating end to a madcap buildup.
4. Airplane antics with Hackett and Rooney, whether that involves crashing into a sign or buzzing by windows.
5. Jimmy Durante, in his last film role, setting the stage of events with a face considered by Kramer to be fitting in being funny and tragic at the same time - which proves correct in the long run.

Perhaps this film's closest relative is Around the World in 80 Days (1956), which stuffed itself to the gills with cameo appearances when the word wasn't even a cliché yet that also had roadshow release. This is a maniacal effort for its era in a time that razzles, dazzles and bedazzles from scene to scene to make a tremendously long and winding road film befitting anyone who enjoys a good time with a laugh, right down to the last banana peel. There aren't many films like this one, that much is for sure. It wasn't the be all end all comedy to outdo them all (nor the one to end the idea of doing a big search for money with a big cast), but it certainly stands today as a comedy big enough for all people to enjoy in some fashion.

Overall, I give it 9 out of 10 stars.

April 1, 2020

Quicksand (1950).

Review #1374: Quicksand.

Cast: 
Mickey Rooney (Dan), Jeanne Cagney (Vera), Barbara Bates (Helen), Peter Lorre (Nick), Taylor Holmes (Harvey), Art Smith (Mackey), Wally Cassell (Chuck), Richard Lane (Lt. Nelson), Patsy O'Connora (Millie), John Gallaudet (Moriarity), and Minerva Urecal (Landlady) Directed by Irving Pichel (#617 - Destination Moon and #709 - The Most Dangerous Game)

Review: 
Every decade has its dawn and characteristics that distinguish it from the one before it, particularly for film. The 1920s served as a prosperous time for silent film while the 1930s cultivated sound into a permanent trend alongside finding ways to entertain Great Depression audiences and the 1940s
found war along with film noir and the beginning of the end of the studio system. With the beginning of the Atomic Age, one could only wonder how different things could get for film and the world at large. With scares of the television and red kind, stars and directors found themselves at a crossroad over where to go with a choice beyond studio loyalty in free-lance work. In this case, this film served as a crossroad for its stars and director. Rooney, to put it lightly, had one of the most distinguished careers in acting. He had his debut in film at the age of six, having started in vaudeville with his parents before they separated and his mother moved with him to Hollywood. The following year, he starred in the short film series Mickey McGuire, doing 78 films in seven years. He would find himself into stardom in the latter half of the 1930s with films such as A Midsummer Night's Dream (1935), A Family Affair (1937), and Boys Town (1938). He had reached the peak of his career by the time of his 30s (including an Academy Juvenile Award at the age of 18), but he kept on in a variety of media for 88 years until his death in 2014, whether it was a big or small film role, television, or even Broadway. Lorre had come from the stage to film through Fritz Lang's M (1931) before settling in Hollywood four years later. He had a career of B-movies and character roles that allowed for some highlights, such as Mad Love (1935), The Maltese Falcon (1941), and The Beast with Five Fingers (1946). His career had slowed down in the late 1940s, but he continued on until his death in 1964. Pichel had his start in the theater after graduating from Harvard, soon finding himself into directing alongside character roles in film in the 1920s and 1930s. He had his debut in film direction with The Most Dangerous Game (1932). His career slowed down in the 1950s as a victim of blacklisting (a consequence of fear over certain activity of American writers and directors), with a subsequent heart condition leading to his death in 1954.

This is a decent little film noir, one with a quiet presence of careful pace and a standout performance from Rooney that makes this ever-growing web of seediness and naivety work out fine. Rooney makes things work as well as they do because we can see ourselves in this everyman though his various moments with others in an attempt to play against type, playing tension with grace. Cagney does well with in a role oozing alongside a descent, while Bates serves as a decent contrast, although both have just slight chemistry with Rooney. Lorre is nice to see with his careful seedy presence, but he disappears from the film after the first half (speaking of sudden appearances, Bates really only becomes a presence in the last 25 minutes), since the real villain of the film is ill-advised decision making. Noirs can find themselves in binding twists and turns, and this one (written by Robert Smith) moves along for 79 minutes with an aim for descent that one can at least think is possible (where one mistake can lead to several others) without shaking their heads too much, particularly with its ending, where crime may not pay, but that doesn't mean one mistake is too much to overcome with time. Ultimately, this is a fairly competent little noir from Pichel as a useful curiosity through Rooney and Lorre that serves itself well in the public domain to view at some point in time.

Overall, I give it 7 out of 10 stars.

May 17, 2017

The Atomic Kid.


Review #935: The Atomic Kid.

Cast:
Mickey Rooney (Barnaby 'Blix' Waterberry), Robert Strauss (Stan Cooper), Elaine Devry (Audrey Nelson), Bill Goodwin (Dr. Rodell), Robert Emmett Keane (Mr. Reynolds), Whit Bissell (Dr. Edgar Pangborn), Joey Forman (MP in hospital), Dan Riss (Jim, FBI Chief Agent), Peter Leeds (FBI Agent Bill), and Hal March (FBI Agent Ray) Directed by Leslie H. Martinson (#177 - Batman)

Review:
I suppose the random nature of this show means that any film I happen to come across is fair game for reviewing...and this one (distributed by Republic Pictures) just popped up. I suppose summer vacation is the best time to churn out some more reviews, no matter what the result. This is the first time I'm reviewing a film with Mickey Rooney as the main star, and what better than a movie where he gets an atomic bomb dropped on him? Or one where he eats a sandwich with peanut butter sardines, and horse radish? Of particular note is that the film was written (along with Benedict Freedman and John Fenton Murray) by Blake Edwards, one year before he became a director. This is a movie that clearly aspires to be something easily digestible while being considerably thin in plot. Rooney is somewhat entertaining, managing to have some fun, and he has somewhat capable buddy chemistry with Strauss, though they don't have much screen-time in the middling middle parts of the movie until the end of the film. Devry (billed as "Ms. Mickey Rooney" in the beginning credits) and Rooney are somewhat interesting to watch, but they can't carry the movie to any real enjoyment. It really is just a movie with some mild gags, simply put. This is a movie not worth complaining too much about in part because remembering it is more of an effort than trying to actively give criticism. Is there any highlights? I guess the geiger counter watch is somewhat neat looking, though it is muddled by all the gags involving the main character's neutrons changed anytime he gets in contact with the nurse (get it?). Somehow, the plot includes a spy ring, though it doesn't really go anywhere. Simply put, it's a stale but harmless kind of movie.

Overall, I give it 5 out of 10 stars.

October 14, 2013

Movie Night: The Magic Voyage.


Review #467: The Magic Voyage.

Cast
Dom DeLuise (Christopher Columbus), Corey Feldman (Pico), Irene Cara (Marilyn), Dan Haggerty (The Swarm Lord / King Ferdinand IV), Mickey Rooney (Narrator), and Samantha Eggar (Queen Isabella) Directed by Michael Schoemann.

Review
The director stated (I kid you not) that this film was to be: "intended to be a film about the discovery of America (Side note: I wonder what the Vikings would say about this...) from a more satirical view in order to differentiate ourselves clearly from the lofty views of history so we can present Columbus as a lovable, charming and befuddled scholar."

The film was made in 1992 originally for German audiences as Die Abenteuer von Pico und Columbus (which roughly translates to The Adventures of Pico and Columbus), as it would be later dubbed in English twice, being released in 1993, just around the 500th anniversary of Columbus' voyage, in which he landed in the Bahamas (as he never actually landed in North America). Given my day off for Columbus Day (which makes me wonder why it's only for Columbus and not for other explorers like Magellan, Ericson, or even explorers in space), I decided to review this.

Why did I talk so much about the film's history? Because I can't decide which is weirder, the film or its history. The main question of the film can be thought of almost immediately after starting to watch this film, and the question is: When did the film get so crazy? Likely answers would be either when Columbus speaks to the woodworm, the fact that a woodworm knows the Earth is round, when the Swarm Lord (No I am not making this up) is introduced, or...all of the above. Halfway through, I started wondering if 1492: Conquest of Paradise or Carry On Columbus would've been better or worse then this, but I'm sure someone else has already answered that for me. The dubbing is notably ad libbed, but not even Dom Deluise can brighten up the film. The animation is poor at times, resembling more of a television movie then an actual motion picture. Trying to mention the inaccuracies that the film has would take way too long to write, and writing so much isn't something I try to do all the time, because I've always assumed no one likes reading a wall of text without some breathing room. You may wonder if there are any redeemable factors in this film, and...there isn't. The terrible animation, the even worse dubbing, the fact this was even made, and just the inane nature of this whole film. Fittingly, the film ends with Columbus musing that there will be a city made on the place they landed in, which turns out to be...New York City. Such a inaccurate statement for such a terrible film. I'd give this film a negative rating if I had to, but since I can't, this film gets to join Birdemic: Shock and Terror and The Garbage Pail Kids Movie in such a non-prestigious honor.

Overall, I give it 0 out of 10 stars.