Showing posts with label Adam Goldberg. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Adam Goldberg. Show all posts

August 29, 2020

Saving Private Ryan.


Review #1520: Saving Private Ryan.

Cast: 
Tom Hanks (Captain John H. Miller), Edward Burns (Private Richard Reiben), Matt Damon (Private James Francis Ryan), Tom Sizemore (Sergeant Mike Horvath), Jeremy Davies (Corporal Timothy Upham), Vin Diesel (Private Adrian Caparzo), Adam Goldberg (Private Stanley Mellish), Barry Pepper (Private Daniel Jackson), Giovanni Ribisi (Medic Irwin Wade), Ted Danson (Captain Fred Hamill), Paul Giamatti (Sergeant William Hill), Dennis Farina (Lieutenant Colonel Walter Anderson), Joerg Stadler (Steamboat Willie), Max Martini (Corporal Henderson), and Nathan Fillion (Private James Frederick Ryan) Directed by Steven Spielberg (#126 - Close Encounters of the Third Kind, #168 - Raiders of the Lost Ark, #169 - Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom, #170 - Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade, #302 - Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, #351 - Schindler's List, #480 - Jaws, #563 - The Sugarland Express, #573 - E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial, #642 - Jurassic Park, #958 - Always, #1068 - Ready Player One, #1305 - Catch Me If You Can, and #1478 - The Color Purple)

Review: 
"What Steven wanted to do from the get-go was to use all of his magic, and all of the tools that existed in cinema as of 1997, and make a war movie that was going to break every one of the tropes, visually and cinematically, that all war movies had"

The 1990s were an interesting time for films, with Steven Spielberg being a significant contributor to that distinction through six films, which primarily resulted in audience attention, a studio that he helped to establish in DreamWorks Pictures, and three Academy Awards. Within those films are a mix of both adventure and historical drama, although this would be his first epic war film since Empire of the Sun (1987). The genesis for the script by Robert Rodat came from inspiration over the Niland brothers while reading Stephen Ambrose's book about D-Day (Ambrose's other book in Band of Brothers would later be turned into a miniseries by Spielberg and Hanks). There were four brothers in the family that served in World War II, with three of them fighting in the Normandy campaign. The surviving brother was believed to be the only Niland left, and he was shipped back to the United States to complete his service (however his oldest brother, a member of the Army Air Forces captured in a POW camp, was eventually liberated before the end of the war). The script appealed to Spielberg and his interest in the war, which he once described as "the most significant event of the last 100 years", one in which his father had served in as a member of the Army Air Corps, with the younger Spielberg being fascinated with the war due to his father's stories and recollections and what was depicted of it on American television; some of his early short films were combat ones inspired by his father. It shouldn't be surprising that the actors seem up to what is required in depicting combat with respect, since the main stars all endured a mini-session of boot camp led by Marine Dale Dye, who you might hear about as a trainer for other military-themed films.

The film opens and ends at the same place that seems interesting for an epic war film: the Normandy American Cemetery and Memorial, with Harrison Young as our first focus as a certain veteran here to pay his respects. I found these sequences to be fairly well-done in setting the film on pace for the thought that occurs after war when it comes to sacrifice in the horrors of war. And then of course there is the second sequence of the film, likely one of the best ever put to film that involves the landing on Omaha Beach in Normandy, France, with over a thousand extras used within a recreation of the beach shot in Ireland. There is nothing quite like it in such devastating power as it moves across the killing field with tactile precision that makes for a harrowing experience for its viewers (who can feel every little moment of spilled seasickness and various other things) to set in and feel immediately without pretense. Soldiers being taken down before they hit the sand is still a striking image to dwell on. It has been a point of debate over the idea of said battle being the "peak" moment of the film. To me, that's pretty ridiculous, because that seems to imply that the rest of the film isn't as maintained in heightened fear or well-executed in discipline. If the D-Day sequence was at the end, would we being saying the same thing? Of course I also don't find the film drowns in maudlin nature unlike others - it grips me and keeps that grip firm and steady. I found that the film worked just as well in building its conflict within its mission that makes the inevitable fates all the more successful. One doesn't bat an eye much at the 169 minute run-time because of how well-involved it is when relaying the sacrifices made in the name of war. The film does its best work in depicting the fears and instincts that made up the men to fight without becoming a caricature, the absolute best in uncompromising epics for what Spielberg wanted to do.

But enough about details, there has to be a cast to go with it. Hanks proves quite resilient in displaying the humane side of persisting onward with what he must do regardless of the reasons or consequences, one who maintains himself with range that stands on his own terms as a useful lead to follow without becoming swept up in platitudes. Damon, showing himself past the halfway point does well with role filled in reluctance and care apart from the main group that does what is needed. Burns (in his first role that he also did not direct/write/produce, as he debuted with The Brothers McMullen three years prior) and Sizemore both do well with simmering intensity that carry the film in moving with the tides of weariness that doesn't seem wavering. Davies works well with unassuming quiver that we observe in the contrast between combat in translation and non-combat in translation a different way that sells that harrowing last shot of him worth it. Another filmmaker featured in this film Diesel, who had previously made two low-budget films of his own (as writer, director, producer, and star), and it was his short in Strays (1997) that impressed Spielberg to wedge his way into this film, and Diesel makes the most of it with some of the hard-edged charisma that would later make him a star. The others that are peppered through the film work handily in keeping the candor efficient from its journey across the fields of war with care, whether that involves folks like Goldberg or smaller turns for Danson and Giamatti. As a film that set itself on garnering more realism from what had come from war films in the previous decades (which featured films such as The Longest Day), Saving Private Ryan packs enough a wallop in its initial setup of harrowing bloodshed to make its resulting story a stirring experience that leaves its audience something it cannot forget about as just entertainment when it ends.

Overall, I give it 10 out of 10 stars.

October 1, 2018

Dazed and Confused.


Review #1138: Dazed and Confused.

Cast: 
Jason London (Randall "Pink" Floyd), Wiley Wiggins (Mitch Kramer), Sasha Jenson (Don Dawson), Michelle Burke (Jodi Kramer), Christine Harnos (Kaye Faulkner), Rory Cochrane (Ron Slater), Ben Affleck (Fred O'Bannion), Adam Goldberg (Mike Newhouse), Anthony Rapp (Tony Olson), Marissa Ribisi (Cynthia Dunn), Catherine Avril Morris (Julie Simms), Matthew McConaughey (David Wooderson), Shawn Andrews (Kevin Pickford), Cole Hauser (Benny O'Donnell), Milla Jovovich (Michelle Burroughs), Joey Lauren Adams (Simone Kerr), Christin Hinojosa (Sabrina Davis), and Parker Posey (Darla Marks) Directed by Richard Linklater (#645 - School of Rock)

Review: 
It seems only natural to cover this film, released in the years after other coming-of-age teen comedies such as Porky's (1981), Fast Times at Ridgemont High (1982), Sixteen Candles (1984), but with an intent to stand out from those by trying to depict high school without trying to verge into any unnecessary drama while having an assortment of 70s songs wrapped up in a small-town movie without too much plot. I suppose the best words to describe it would be to just describe it as something wrapped in a time capsule with a bunch of albums and a bunch of items of leisure stuffed inside that will certainly take some people back while being handy entertainment for others. With such a big group of actors and characters like this, it's interesting to see who doesn't get lost in the shuffle too much and stick out.  London is a pretty fair lead to follow along with, a casual kind of guy that proves useful for a few laughs. Wiggins is also pretty casual, fitting in with what the film wants to go without looking out-of-place. Others such as Jenson, Burke and Harnos are okay, and Cochrane is pretty amusing to be around with. Affleck, in one of his first film roles, stands out handily, making something out of his bully material that can certainly seem familiar - for better or worse. Goldberg, Rapp, and Ribisi, playing an intellectual trio occasionally mixed in with the fun times, prove to be alright with having a few awkward laughs. Easily, the one who stands out is McConaughey, starring in his second ever role (appearing in a bit role in My Boyfriend's Back the same year), doing well with what he is given that makes for such amazement. He just sticks out with the way he chooses to interact in this landscape, whether when talking about a car or when talking about "livin'", it's easy to see in retrospect how he became such a prominent star. It is clear that there was a dedicated effort to capture an exact feel for the setting of the summer of 1976, with one-sixth of the six million dollar budget going towards licensing for usage of the songs featured from "Rock and Roll, Hoochie Koo" by Rick Derringer to "Slow Ride" by Foghat.

The movie isn't really about anything too deep in particular through its 102 minute run-time, but what it shows through its numerous characters is people certainly having some sort of good time. There isn't any kind of overtly cliche characters, everyone seems to just blend in, for lack of a better term that will prove interesting to follow through with for the most part. There isn't too much of an aim beyond just where it wants to show, but it isn't just a nostalgia trip that worships the "glory days" of high school; obviously the lens one views that era of their lives is different for a teen from the 1970s than a kid from the 2010s, and it'll play into how they see scenes in the film such as the scenes with the teens at the main hangout place or the casual conversations that go on there or elsewhere, or the scenes involving hazing the incoming freshman or the scene with neighborhood cruising while wrecking mailboxes. Perhaps having good memories of the times of the youth make this a great sit-through. I can look back on my times of youth decently enough, but I can't for the life of me think that I need to recollect these memories too much, but perhaps that's not the whole point. I myself am not too hard on movies for relying a bit on nostalgia, just as long as it doesn't go overboard - which the movie does fine with. The film resonated with me more often than not, but I can't find myself thinking that this is anything too particularly great, just being a decent feature. It will serve as handy entertainment for those who are curious to seek it, whether if looking for a decent time, palatable music or a trip to a different age.

Next Time: Spooktober officially begins.

Overall, I give it 7 out of 10 stars.