Showing posts with label Oscar Micheaux. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Oscar Micheaux. Show all posts

February 3, 2023

The Symbol of the Unconquered.

Review #1967: The Symbol of the Unconquered.

Cast: 
Iris Hall (Eve Mason), Walker Thompson (Hugh Van Allen), Lawrence Chenault (Jefferson Driscoll), Mattie Wilkes (Mother Driscoll), Louis Dean (August Barr), Leigh Whipper (Tugi, Indian Fakir), with James Burroughs, Jim Burris, G. Tatum (Abraham), George Catlin (Dick Mason), and Edward Fraction (Peter Kaden) Directed by Oscar Micheaux (#1633 - Within Our Gates and #1795 - Body and Soul)

Review: 
This film was made in Fort Lee, New Jersey by the "Czar of Black Hollywood" in Oscar Micheaux. He was a promoter through and through: an advertisement that survives for public viewing describes the film as a "story of the Negro (without the "Uncle Tom stuff") with a Northwestern setting, all the while saying that the story, players, director, cameraman, and even the art titles were all by black people. As the most successful African American filmmaker of the first half of the 20th century, his films may not have had the best history in enduring on a consistent basis (three silent films out of a handful survive) or with the greatest material, but he is fundamentally important to understanding film beyond the usual expectations set out in its early days. He was a man who made his way across the country in work in various jobs that had included homesteading, as he believed that hard work and enterprise above all was the way to make one rise to respect and prominence for any color. So, yes, it should make sense that Micheaux wanted to make a film that saw Black folk take on the Ku Klux Klan along with seeing how race could affect relationships (in this case, folks with light-skinned African Americans); hell, if D. W. Griffith could make blatant propaganda with The Birth of a Nation involving the Klan, why couldn't Micheaux? He made movies for an audience that he felt wanted to see their stories on screen by going around the country and getting deals with theaters to help show his films.

The version that survived is one that had French intertitles, oddly enough. A restoration (as restored by The Museum of Modern Art Department of Film and Video and Turner Classic Movies in cooperation with The Oscar Micheaux Society) was done, so one can watch it, but not all of the material survived, most notably with the climax that apparently had action within the sequence of blacks defending against a Klan attack. For a film that lasts 54 minutes, one can say it moves pretty quickly for what is basically a take on the Western with its attempts to show rugged individualism shine through despite the odds (read: hustlers) against them. It is the story of trying to make advancements for oneself without pandering to fantasy (so yes, hard work and enterprise) in order to try and not be boxed in. If you've seen one Micheaux film, you know what you are getting into with something such as this, which is something that is raw and mildly interesting to those with the patience to sit through something where the actors try their hardest to not be stifled by fast shooting and a considerable sprinkling of title cards. It speaks to something that is timeless however: seeing just how people treat themselves, as is the case with mixed-race folks (whether involving scorn or not). Hall and Thompson at least balance things out as decent leads for easy presentability when contrasted with the self-hating Chenault. I have to admit that it is probably the lesser of the three Micheaux surviving silents, since it doesn't have as much to offer in diverting acting or with its story (when it comes to the Klan clash, a scene of a brick toss was seen by audiences of the time, but that scene was lost later); the resolution is as lowkey as it gets as well. As a whole, it is a movie of vignettes that is clearly meant to please with its edges of bluntness that is mildly entertaining and generally useful for those clearly invested into silent films. Micheaux may have made them fast and quick, but he made them with worthwhile determination that has made him an enduring face of black cinema. 

Overall, I give it 7 out of 10 stars.

Well, well, well, here is another Black History Month. We just had to start off with Oscar Micheaux just like what happened in 2021 and 2022, and the pattern of going in chronological order will continue as well, which will see familiar and new faces being covered from directors to actors that I hope makes for a suitable tribute within black cinema. Next up is Souls of Sin.

February 4, 2022

Body and Soul.

Review #1795: Body and Soul.

Cast: 
Paul Robeson (Reverend Isaiah T. Jenkins / His brother Sylvester), Mercedes Gilbert (Sister Martha Jane - Isabelle's Mother), Julia Theresa Russell (Isabelle - the Girl), Lawrence Chenault (Yello-Curley' Hinds - the Phony Reverend's Former Jailmate), Marshall Rogers (Speakeasy proprietor), Lillian Johnson ("Sis" Caline, a Pious Lady), Madame Robinson ("Sis" Lucy, a Pious Lady), Chester A. Alexander (Deacon Simpkins, a Church Elder), and Walter Cornick (Brother Amos, a Church Elder) Written, Directed, and Produced by Oscar Micheaux (#1633 - Within Our Gates)

Review: 
I'm sure you already know that Oscar Micheaux was a distinct man of his time as director. After all, we already saw how well Within Our Gates (1920) went with audiences, serving as the second of his ventures into filmmaking, for which he aimed to tell interesting stories for black audiences. He made over forty features in the span of 29 years, but of the silent portion in his filmography (which he did until 1930), only three survive (Within Our Gates, The Symbol of the Unconquered, Body and Soul). This was adapted from his novel of the same name, as was the case for a number of his films. Of course, the true story to tell is the fact that this is the debut starring role of Paul Robeson. He was born in Princeton, New Jersey in 1898 to a Presbyterian minister and a descendant of the Bustills. He excelled in both acting and sports as a youth, and he wound up winning a state contest for a scholarship to Rutgers College, which he would attend in 1915. He excelled as a member of the football team, the debate team, and singing and graduated (as with high school, he graduated as valedictorian). He then studied law at the New York University School of Law in 1919 and Columbia Law School in 1920 before making his first venture into acitng into the theater in 1920. In 1921 and 1922, he played football in the freshly-created National Football League for Akron and Milwaukee before he graduated. However, he elected to move into acting as opposed to law due to encountering racism at the firm he was hired to work. It was his wife Eslanda that insisted on driving him towards becoming an actor, for which he would excel with performances such as the 1925 revival of the play The Emperor Jones, and it was his wife that negotiated him into this film (incidentally, the two would star together once in Borderline (1930)). Robeson would do various acting performances in the theater and in film, most notable with Othello and Show Boat (1936) while serving as a key figure in the Harlem Renaissance; until his death in 1976, he dedicated himself to a "worldwide cause of humanity for freedom, peace and brotherhood" that advocated for several causes (such as the Council on African Affairs) despite dealing with being investigated in the 1950s for his support of certain causes and policies. In total, he acted in a dozen feature films before disputes on the production of the anthology film Tales of Manhattan (1942) with stereotyping caused him to cease association with Hollywood, but he had a long-running career in concert (spent primairly in Europe) that sealed his reputation as a great African American icon of his time.

Robeson did not exactly take kindly to the film in later years, referring to The Emperor Jones (1933) as his true screen debut. Micheaux was a dilligent filmmaker when it came to getting them done with the budget he had that led to a few "mistakes" being kept in the final version of the film that was shown wherever it could be shown for Black audiences (of course, trying to pass a 31-year old as someone's mother despite being just four years older than their on-screen daughter is its own story), complete with distinct intertitles for characters in grammar. If you thought Within Our Gates had tendancies of a soap opera within its attempts to tell a story involving the dual nature of man: specifically a corrupt preacher and the people that are affected by his actions, one where pictures of Abraham Lincoln, Frederick Douglass, and Booker T. Washington are seen on the wall. Of course, there also is a love triangle involving Robeson playing both the evil preacher and his twin-brother inventor that each have their own trials and tribulations with trying to earn money (and a Bible with money hidden in it!). He may have been a melodrama-man, but he was also a story-teller that wanted to show sensitive topics on screen (lynching was present in Gates, for example), so this isn't too different. You may be wondering just what is with the ending. Well, apparently making a 1925 film about a priest who is portrayed as sinister is just too much for some censor boards, most notably with the New York board, which disagreed with the original nine reel version. With a lack of time to make reshoots, Micheaux had to come up with a quick ending that made the events...a dream, for which the film was now at five reels (a screenplay for the film is not intact, therefore making it hard to see exactly what was lost). Robeson is obviously the highlight of the film, one who gets to engage with the screen for two distinct performances that work out for tremendous effect, with the sly shuffling between the two being interesting enough to show just where the line goes in the pursuit of better living in that time and place. Gilbert isn't forgotten here, however, as she manages well with careful timing that makes her the heart of the film when it comes to well-meaning folks trying to maintain themselves in a world of doubt for folks that certainly valued their Sundays like no other. Russell does fine as the pawn in the middle, wrapped with shaky grace. As a whole, Micheaux and Robeson each ended up getting what was best for them. The director continued to make movies on the circuit with quick drive while the actor got to be involved in the process of what it means to make movies. It should be mentioned that of all the movies Robeson made, this one was the only one made by an black director. In that regard, Body and Soul (1925) is a fair achievement for both of them.

Overall, I give it 8 out of 10 stars.

Well, February is here again. It shouldnt surprise you to see Movie Night honor Black History Month for the second year in a row, seeing how the first one turned out. There will be a handful of new and familiar faces seen this month in black stars and directors, and the next film up is Two Gun Man from Harlem.

February 1, 2021

Within Our Gates.

Review #1633: Within Our Gates.

Cast:
Evelyn Preer (Sylvia Landry), Floy Clements (Alma Prichard), James D. Ruffin (Conrad Drebert, Sylvia's Fiancé), Jack Chenault (Larry Prichard, Alma's Stepbrother), William Smith (Philip Gentry, a detective), Charles D. Lucas (Dr. V. Vivian), Bernice Ladd (Mrs. Geraldine Stratton), Mrs. Evelyn (Mrs. Elena Warwick), William Starks (Jasper Landry), Ralph Johnson (Philip Gridlestone), and E.G. Tatum (Efrem) Written, Directed, and Produced by Oscar Micheaux.

Review:
“I have always tried to make my photoplays present the truth, to lay before the Race a cross-section of its own life, to view the Colored heart from close range. It is only by presenting those portions of the Race portrayed in my pictures, in the light and background of their true state, that we can raise our people to greater heights.”

There have been numerous ambitious filmmakers featured throughout the annals of Movie Night but one that cannot be forgotten in terms of importance with generating movies for generations is Oscar Micheaux. He was 35 upon the completion of his first film, but he already had lived a life of hard work and enterprise. Born to a family of thirteen, he had lived a life on a farm alongside the city, and he would hone social skills from his first line of work in marketing to future use. In his adult life, he would do a variety of jobs that ranged from the stockyards to Pullman porter before eventually making enough to buy and operate his own land as a homesteader. It was the experiences spent with his own land in Gregory County, South Dakota that helped shape him into writing, for he wrote the first of seven novels beginning in 1913. His novel The Homesteader (1918) attracted interest into filmmaking, with initial negotiations being done with George P. Johnson's Lincoln Motion Picture Company, although Micheaux's disagreements about wanting to direct led him to pursue the idea himself, for which he would produce for himself by having people he knew buy stock into his company. The Homesteader (1919) was not the first ever film directed by an African American director, as there had been race films for nearly a decade (with companies such as The Foster Photoplay Company with The Railroad Porter in 1913), but the film was a pioneer for feature-length film done with a primarily African American cast and crew. Unfortunately, it is now considered lost, but his second film does still survive, albeit under lucky circumstances, as it was believed to have been lost for decades before one print was found within the national film archive of Spain, which had its own edits (as is the case with having to deal with censors; of his three silent films to survive, only one [Body and Soul] has its original intertitles all survive).

The film was made on a budget of $15,000, and it was shot with the help of friends to borrow homes for shooting alongside moments spent on the street of Chicago while having little time for re-takes. Remember, one is watching a film that only exists in the closest way imaginable to how it would have been in 1920, with reconstructed intertitles and restoration from the Library of Congress to try and fill the gaps (which sometimes involves slang, as was the style for Micheaux in his novels and his silents). Micheaux wanted to make a film that would appeal to promoting hard work and respect over the dangers of ignorance that could (and had) led to prejudice, regardless of if one had lived in the Northern or Southern United States (riots that occurred in Chicago the previous year proved a hinderance with getting the film past the censors for a time), which still strikes a chord today with its focus upon combatting racism and the horror of lynching. It does all this within a melodrama that will leave plenty to discuss and engage with if one is in the mood for a curiosity within a silent film for 80 minutes, whether involving abandoned finances, schools in trouble, or secrets revealed. It addresses the problems of the time that its target audience of the time would recognize within a story that jumps over rural and urban lines while giving them a story that will shock them with how blunt Micheaux dares to go in provocation, and it only seems fitting that Micheaux would later be referred to as "The Czar of Black Hollywood", for which he would make over forty films in three decades of work. Not to be forgotten in all of this is the star that Micheaux would use for numerous films in Preer - sadly, this is the one and only performance one can judge of Peer, since it is the only feature film with her in a feature role that has been preserved. The Mississippi native had a career of thirteen years in acting that was cut prematurely from her death in 1932 (dying of double pneumonia), but she did her part in a variety of acting opportunities, which ranged from Micheaux's featuring of her in nine movies to bit roles to shorts to work in the theater. She clearly seems to the task for handling drama, one that doesn't seem to fall prey to a middling take because she is playing right to the stage for drama without needing overacting to make it count. In short, she can handle the balance of flashbacks and swings between romance and betrayal. The only other person of significance in the acting field is an interesting one with Clements, who had her appearances in this and another Micheaux film, but she eventually moved on to work involving work within ward committees and she ran and won a term as a representative of the House for the state of Illinois - Clements may have done just okay with this film (one that just involves jealousy), but at least she did find a place for herself besides acting. The others do okay, mostly trying to avoid the mish-mash of one-take shooting and sudden swings of narrative that can feature moments involving philanthropic opportunity through being hit by a car to horrific vigilantism to the sudden happy ending. Ruffin plays bombast for about five minutes, while Chenault does the conniving okay to go with a useful Lucas. Ladd and Evelyn provide the other side of the coin involving the clash of philanthropy and the eyes of people who think differently about who deserves it most for a certain reason that make for an interesting episode in a film full of moments like that (one such scene involves a sell-out preacher telling about white folks having all their vices help them go to hell, while another involves the story of Alma near the end). While the film creaks at times when it comes to holding water in its plot construction, it still makes a worthwhile effort from a director that yearned to teach a worthy lesson of endurance overcoming prejudice that still holds true then as was now. It will prove curious alongside painful at times for what it wants to say without becoming odiously obvious about it. Micheaux may not have as many films that are as easily available to view as other creators in the silent era, but he still endures today for the curious viewer who desire to branch out their perspectives into the silent era beyond the usual name.

Overall, I give it 8 out of 10 stars.

Today is the first day of February and Black History Month. After spending nearly a year doing themed months based on certain decades, it only seems natural to retain the idea of using a month to cover films revolving around a certain interest or topic, for which this month will be used to honor Black History Month. There will be quite a few interesting films that will be covered through this month, with a primary interest in African American directors that will go from Oscar Micheaux all the way to the modern era with plenty of new faces to show, which I hope one enjoys.

Next Time: Symbiopsychotaxiplasm.