Showing posts with label Jeff Morrow. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jeff Morrow. Show all posts

October 11, 2021

The Creature Walks Among Us.

Review #1737: The Creature Walks Among Us.

Cast
Jeff Morrow (Dr. William Barton), Rex Reason (Dr. Thomas Morgan), Leigh Snowden (Marcia Barton), Gregg Palmer (Jed Grant), Maurice Manson (Dr. Borg), Ricou Browning (Gill-man – In water), Don Megowan (Gill-man – On land), James Rawley (Dr. Johnson), Paul Fierro (Morteno), Lillian Molieri (Mrs. Morteno), and David McMahon (Captain Stanley) Directed by John Sherwood.

Review
If you recall, Creature from the Black Lagoon (as thought of by producer William Alland and writers Harry Essex, Arthur Ross, and Maurice Zimm) was a worthy monster movie for its time of 1954 that still stands tall today, one that seemed to spook the last terror that Universal had yet to strike in its hodgepodge of literary manipulations and other creative ventures: the terror of the sea. Granted, it did something that felt different (aside from the 3D effect, which you wouldn't really notice unless you actually did see in a theater), in that it was a movie where the creature was (for the most part) provoked in its actions, as opposed to something that came onto us, and it made for a riveting movie for its era. In short: in a time where the monsters of yesteryear were tired, the Creature (as designed by Millicent Patrick) seemed like a fresh step worth taking from the Universal line, whether on water or on land. Of course, one really could learn something from the attempts to continue the Gill-man from where we left it in the first film (i.e. being shot a bunch of times after his attempts at wooing a woman fail): alone, or perhaps in the company of fresher perspective. Revenge of the Creature (1955) only managed to accomplish that one could make seeing a Gill-man in a tank for several minutes with boring characters seem like an experience in dullness, mostly because one seems to feel just as stuck in that tank like the Gill-man (and in Florida, no less). Jack Arnold, who directed the first two films, did not return for this one, and in his place came John Sherwood, a long-time second unit director for Universal, with this being the second of three films he directed (he would die at the age of 55 in 1959 after contracting pneumonia while working on a film). 

You won't find much to particularly draw favor for with the third and final film of the Creature series (as written in story by Ross), mostly because it manages to squander whatever half-baked idea they thought was going to rock scares in new inventive ways by simply not doing anything useful with whatever it was trying to pull with trying to take the creature onto land. Sure, it is a better movie than the previous one, but only by a slim margin, and ultimately one would be better saved by just sticking with the first film. So yes, one wonders how we got to this point: Well, somebody wants to see the Gill-man and do stuff with it (i.e. mutate it in some sort of attempt to get man ready to go to space). Heaven forbid folks learn about what happened the last two times the Creature saw humans, and yet here we are. The problems start to crack into place from the very moments they start their little expedition: it is a tedious affair to find the Creature, and it is especially dull when there are points attempted to be brought up about ethics that wander to where you can't take it seriously (something something the stars or the jungle). Morrow plays a jealous kook who wants to see just where the human chain can go by studying the creature, while the others aren't exactly 100%. By all measures, he is the only interesting presence in the film, which goes against the usual hope for interesting rational acting in its 77 minute run-time (which Reason can't help, considering that the Gill-man, intentionally or not, seems more of the hero in this film anyway). Snowden gets to act against kooky jealousy in Morrow for scenes that range from awkward to "rolling the hands along". Maybe there was supposed to be a point made about how they take the creature down in the middle of the film, because it is such a weak sequence that dulls the reasoned senses, since the Gill-man just happens to bump and slip into being set on fire by these bumblers while they try to track him in the water. At any rate, the title seems more like a trick than anything, since the only time the creature actually walks among the humans on land is when they put him in a cell on a waterside ranch with a bunch of animals and near the ocean. Criminy, that sentence does sound depressing when you think about it, as if the real horror is humans being odd enough to think that one could live with accidentally torching a creature, "fix" it, and they would be just fine. But hey, it turns out that doing so means the Gill-man has become six inches taller and heavier! I suppose shedding gills makes one a bit bigger, and it actually is quite amusing to consider the difference between the sea and land creature, as if making him more imposing was really going to help problems. Perhaps cutting the cast down to just Morrow and the creature would have helped, but maybe I am just spit-balling.

By the time the inevitable happens with the Gill-ish man, it is already too late. Imagine making two quickly made minute movies with the same fundamental trouble of simply wasting a monster with material beneath what it means to make worthy scares or even tragedy. And yet, here we are with a movie that can't establish a useful debate nor a useful body count to go with stuff that seems like the dying throes of a company past its prime in creating spooks for the public. At any rate, there have been several attempts at remaking the series that have seen a revolving door of directors and ideas (including one take from Guillermo del Toro that you might recognize in The Shape of Water), and one can only wonder what will be floated around in the next decade or two. Regardless, the lasting legacy of the Creature series is one of middling curiosity, where a strong and memorable opening film is nearly sunken in what its follow-ups failed to accomplish, although at least this one has a suitable ending to close it all out.

Overall, I give it 6 out of 10 stars.
Next Time: Return of the Fly.

August 20, 2018

Legacy of Blood (1971).


Review #1123: Legacy of Blood.

Cast: 
Rodolfo Acosta (Sheriff Dan Garcia), Merry Anders (Laura Dean), Norman Bartold (Tom Drake), Ivy Bethune (Elga), John Carradine (Christopher Dean), Richard Davalos (Johnny Dean), Faith Domergue (Veronica Dean), Buck Kartalian (Igor Garin), Brooke Mills (Leslie Dean), Jeff Morrow (Gregory Dean), John Russell (Frank Mantee), and John Smith (Dr. Carl Isenburg) Directed by Carl Monson.

Review: 
The most interesting thing about this movie is the fact that there isn't one consistent title - there are three. The titles are Legacy of Blood, Blood Legacy, and Will to Die, but I think I will go with the first one, since that one was used for the opening title sequence. It also happened to be featured on Elvira's Movie Macabre with that same title, who I imagine had more fun delivering commentary for a cruddy film like this than I could generate. In any case, this is a movie that is described as a "mystery slasher" - and I put that term in quotation marks because the film is barely a mystery and barely a slasher in any respectable sense. Basked in cliches, the only surprise is how frustrating it operates itself, having minimal gore but maximum tedium. None of the situations or characters presented aren't too particularly interesting. The best thing one can say about the cast is that Carradine is the only one adept at making something watchable - even material boring as this. He's kooky, but he commands attention that the others can't do as well. There isn't anyone to follow with, whether to cheer or hiss at, just a bunch of oddball people who look like they are either doing it for a paycheck or doing it for "the art", whatever that means. Everybody else comes off as stale or not particularly exciting to follow with, unless you count sideburns as something to look at. The body count goes up at a snail's pace while the soap opera type plot serves to irritate its audience, with its best scene being one single shot - a lamp, which relates back to an earlier line about one character's past. How does a movie manage to make a bee sequence come off as boring? Have the setup to said sequence not make much sense. The climax (and its "twist" ending) is like a big joke to its audience, since it comes out of nowhere while bringing itself to a crashing halt - with a last line that breaks the fourth wall that is a sure groaner. Ultimately, this is a dull experience that is more horrible than horror.

Overall, I give it 3 out of 10 stars.

August 19, 2016

Kronos.


Review #832: Kronos.

Cast
Jeff Morrow (Dr. Leslie Gaskell), Barbara Lawrence (Vera Hunter), John Emery (Dr. Hubbell Eliot), George O'Hanlon (Dr. Arnold Culver), Morris Ankrum (Dr. Albert Stern), Kenneth Alton (McCrary - The Pickup Driver), John Parrish (Gen. Perry), Jose Gonzales-Gonzales (Manuel Ramirez), and Richard Harrison (Pilot) Directed by Kurt Neumann (#618 - Rocketship X-M and #710 - The Fly)

Review
This was made on a low budget of less than $200,000 in less than a month by Regal Films, which was distributed by 20th Century Fox. Kronos is certainly an interesting sci-fi flick, with the big villain being a giant robotic accumulator that tries to absorb all the energy of Earth. This is the stuff that comic book plots are made of, but there really is something interesting about a giant battery attacking the Earth that is nicknamed "Kronos". It's not a movie with a giant mutated monster, or even aliens shown on screen, which sure is interesting for the time. The special effects are pretty good for the time. Sometimes the aerial shots look a bit hokey (such as when a helicopter lands on Kronos, or when it departs), but it's nothing too laughable. The shots where it moves are pretty special, though the sound effects it makes when firing is a bit silly. The cast is somewhat interesting, with Morrow and Lawrence having a decent amount of chemistry. Emery is pretty interesting to watch. There's no real traces of over dramatic acting nor cheese, falling in a standard but acceptable realm for most. This is a pretty little hidden gem that serves its purpose at 78 minutes that one can have fun with.

Unrelated to the review, but my heart goes out to those affected by the ongoing floods in Louisiana and the wildfire in California. It breaks my heart seeing people suffer like this, and I can't even begin to imagine what you are going through. Good luck to all of you.

Overall, I give it 7 out of 10 stars.

October 15, 2012

Movie Night: The Giant Claw.


Review #255: The Giant Claw.

Cast
Jeff Morrow (Mitch MacAfee), Mara Corday (Sally Caldwell), Morris Ankrum (Lieutenant General Edward Considine), Lou Merrill (Pierre Broussard), Edgar Barrier (Dr. Karol Noymann), and Robert Shayne (General Van Buskirk) Directed by Fred F. Sears.

Review
Whoo, I get to review a 50's film with a "giant claw" and in a limited length of 75 minutes. So how is it? My feelings after the movie? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA...To begin with, the film starts out decently, until the giant claw appears, looking...pretty silly. With a mohawk for feathers and a constant yelp, the claw actually rivals another film reviewed here with birds for silliest one ever. Which one? Birdemic: Shock and Terror (#184) Okay, maybe not that silly. The film slowly develops towards its predictable end with "meh" dialogue. How did I hear of this film? I saw a video made by James Rolfe (of Cinemassacre fame) on Monster Madness, which talked about this film. So I decided to watch the film to see all of its madness. And there we go. Although this film did inspire me to think of a new story idea: Gojira vs. The Giant Claw... On second thought, maybe not.

Overall, I give it 3 out of 10 stars.