Showing posts with label Neil McCallum. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Neil McCallum. Show all posts

May 19, 2020

Dr. Terror's House of Horrors.

Review #1419: Dr. Terror's House of Horrors.

Cast: 
Peter Cushing (Dr. Schreck)

"Werewolf" segment": Neil McCallum (Jim Dawson, Ursula Howells (Mrs. Deirdre Biddulph), Peter Madden (Caleb), Katy Wild (Valda), and Edward Underdown (Tod) 
"Creeping Vine" segment: Ann Bell (Ann Rogers), Bernard Lee (Hopkins), Alan Freeman (Bill Rogers), Jeremy Kemp (Jerry Drake), and Sarah Nicholls (Carol Rogers)
"Voodoo" segment: Roy Castle (Biff Bailey), Kenny Lynch (Sammy Coin), Harold Lang (Roy Shine), Christopher Carlos (Vrim), and Thomas Baptiste (Dambala)
"Disembodied Hand" segment: Christopher Lee (Franklyn Marsh), Michael Gough (Eric Landor), Isla Blair (Pretty girl), Judy Cornwell (Nurse), and Hedger Wallace (Surgeon)
"Vampire" segment: Donald Sutherland (Dr. Bob Carroll), Max Adrian (Dr. Blake), Jennifer Jayne (Nicolle Carroll), and Al Mulock (Detective)

Directed by Freddie Francis (#854 - They Came from Beyond Space, #856 - The Evil of Frankenstein, #860 - Dracula Has Risen from the Grave, #1145 - Tales from the Crypt)

Review: 
"As far back as I can ever remember, without really knowing it I wanted to be an actor. I was always dressing up, you know, playing pretend, putting on mothers hats and things. I'm sure Freud would have something to say about that. It was very much in my blood."

"Making films has never just been a job to me, it is my life. I have some interests outside of acting - I sing and I've written books, for instance - but acting is what keeps me going, it's what I do, it gives life purpose."

Horror, particularly horror in a decade of expanding tastes like the 1960s, can come in any kind of package. Anthology is a particular interesting manner in telling stories revolving around something creepy that can be linked together by either a theme, a character or a framing device. There have been plenty of anthology films in numerous genres, but one key anthology film that helped inspire this was Dead of Night (1945), a British production that producer Milton Subotsky liked enough to feel inspired to do his own multi-story film. He had started his work in television, but soon moved to films such as Rock, Rock, Rock (1956) and The City of the Dead (1960), which he produced with Max Rosenberg. In 1962, they would form Amicus Productions, a British company led by the American producers and writer that lasted until 1977. They specialized primarily in horror over the years that would have a share of name actors alongside young and old actors in the cast, particularly when it came to their anthologies. This was the first of seven anthology films they would do over a span of nine years, with those including Torture Garden (1967), The House That Dripped Blood (1970), Asylum (1972), Tales from the Crypt (1972), The Vault of Horror (1973) and From Beyond the Grave (1974). This was filmed in a span of less than three months from Freddie Francis, who had a career of over four decades in both directing and cinematographer that was known for his work on British horror films while winning two Academy Awards for the latter.

Honestly, the parts that are really interesting are the scenes inside the train with Cushing and the main five, since he tries on a beard and an German accent that stand out from the curious others. This isn't surprising to me at this point, because he had a perfectionist and dignified attitude that served him well in six decades of film, stage, television and radio, treating every role with seriousness that he felt his audience would like. One can have a soft spot for British horror when it is done right and Cushing always seems to end up fitting in to most of the right ones. Accompanying him is fellow British actor and friend Lee, who had a career just as versatile and long (nearly seven decades! This includes a singing career before turning 90!) with a distinctive voice that for a change is not playing someone villainous but merely just pompous, which he breezes by without trouble. McCallum and Freeman aren't exactly as well-known in presence (the former being an actor of stage and television and the latter being a disc jockey and radio personality), but they are least serviceable to starting the film with decent leads in their respective stories. Castle, a dancer/singer/comedian comes off with the lesser of the five stories and suffers for it. Sutherland, a Canadian actor doing British roles in film and TV before hitting it big later in this decade, makes for a composed turn in his third career role, fresh in looking for more beyond horror fare.

The segments each have a focus on something you've likely seen in a horror film before, whether that means a supernatural beast or a killer plant/hand or voodoo, and they generally range from average to slightly above average. In this sense, the Lee story involving a hand that follows him around is my personal favorite of the bunch, since it also features Gough for a time (making fun of an art critic, no less) in a segment that has a silly looking effect but enjoyment value regardless. I would say that the werewolf story is a notch below that, having a bit of interest in its coffin hidden in a fake wall that leads to a somewhat played out ending. The vine story also has a silly-looking effect, particularly since it doesn't have much of an ending (regardless of the resolution for the film, which is just as odd), although at least it is nice to see Bernard Lee play his type of authority role and utilize a pipe for safety. The vampire tale is fair, although it probably suffers from having a small time to build a story from the most, complete with the final twist in the knife with its last line (as is the case with the wolf and hand story). The voodoo is the lesser of all the tales (although none are actually terrible), mostly because of how hokey it is in generating actual suspense (copying a tune and getting followed for it, what a twist), but at least none of these tales manage to bore the senses or hold for too long. In the long run, this is a fair package of horror that utilizes its familiar trappings of its genre and stars to useful effect, and it is a serviceable film for its era to pick up on a day for curiosity.

Overall, I give it 7 out of 10 stars.

August 7, 2018

Thunderbirds Are Go.


Review #1118: Thunderbirds Are Go.

Cast: 
Sylvia Anderson (Lady Penelope Creighton-Ward), Ray Barrett (John Tracy / The Hood), Alexander Davion (Space Captain Greg Martin), Peter Dyneley (Jeff Tracy), Christine Finn (Tin-Tin Kyrano), David Graham (Gordon Tracy / Brains / Parker), Paul Maxwell (Captain Paul Travers), Neil McCallum (Dr. Ray Pierce), Bob Monkhouse (Space Navigator Brad Newman / Swinging Star Compere), Shane Rimmer (Scott Tracy), Bud Tingwell (Dr. Tony Grant / Angry Young Man / Public Relations Officer), Jeremy Wilkin (Virgil Tracy / Space Exploration Center President), and Matt Zimmerman (Alan Tracy / Messenger), with Cliff Richard and The Shadows (Themselves) Directed by David Lane (#512 - Thunderbird 6)

Review: 
Nearly five years ago, I encountered Thunderbird 6, the second of two movies based on the series. At the time, I did the film on a lark - with strange results. Needless to say, it was not a film that I had too much enjoyment with, although finding it at a store for $1.86 made it somewhat worth it. I never thought I would encounter Thunderbirds Are Go, the first film based on the series - and yet here we are, so I am obligated to close the loop, even if my experience with the show is nonexistent. Hopefully this review will still prove satisfactory to the standards I try to hold regardless of such fact.

Thunderbirds was a British science-fiction series created by Gerry and Sylvia Anderson that went from 1964 to 1966, with 32 episodes produced and distributed by ITC Entertainment during that span, each lasting 50 minutes. It was made in Supermarionation, which is a blend of the words "super", "marionette" and "animation", with this process having been used before by the Andersons in prior shows such as Four Feather Falls (1960) and used in later shows such as Captain Scarlet and the Mysterons (1967). This film was released on December 12, 1966, thirteen days before the last episode of the series; the show ended production due to attempts at selling the show for American networks by show financier Lew Grade failing, which meant that the second series had only aired six episodes by its end, in contrast to the 26 aired in the first series. In any case, both films made off the show were not financial successes, although I can't say that either film is too terrible to watch. I also will say that neither are particularly "good" films, but I can see the appeal.

Perhaps it is my unfamiliarity with the show that hinders my ability to view the movie through its lens, but it's not like I had that problem with other films based off television shows such as the Star Trek films or Maverick (1994). Perhaps this material works best as a show than a movie. The special effects pieces are done under the supervision of Derek Meddings, who would later do special effects work on films such as the first three Superman films and numerous James Bond films such as Live and Let Die. The effects are certainly interesting to look at times, with the destruction moments holding up for the most part. While I can appreciate the ingenuity it takes to make everything work at times, I feel that the movie suffers from pacing and inconsistency in excitement. The dialogue isn't terrible by any means, but it feels very standard and not as inviting as you would probably expect for an adventure like this, having a dryness that never really kicks into full gear. The actors do fine in delivering the expository nature of the dialogue, but no one besides Anderson really stands out. She has a fair bit of charm to her that sticks out fairly well any time she is on screen. The movie lingers between mild feelings of excitement and boredom, with the strangest moment being a dream sequence involving Cliff Richard and The Shadows. It's a ridiculous moment that is too silly to work on any level, but it sure inspires laughs even if it has no real importance. The film runs at 93 minutes, but the pacing can make it feel longer, particularly when focusing on model sequences. The climax is fine for what it is, and there isn't anything that will prove terrible for kids, but on the whole I can't say that this is something that works for me. It has a look that is fine at times, but it can't quite fulfill all of its expectations.

Overall, I give it 6 out of 10 stars.