Showing posts with label Doug McGrath. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Doug McGrath. Show all posts

July 2, 2021

Down the Road Again.

Review #1694: Down the Road Again.

Cast: 
Doug McGrath (Pete McGraw), Kathleen Robertson (Betty-Jo Mayle), Anthony Lemke (Matt Burns), Jayne Eastwood (Betty Mayle), Cayle Chernin (Selina), Tedde Moore (Annie Burns), Kristin Adams (Secretary), John Cleland (Sammy), and Elva Mai Hoover (Housekeeper) Written and Directed by Donald Shebib (#408 - Goin' Down the Road)

Review: 
"I think “Down the Road Again” has a better script, more emotional. It will never have the effect the original one had, that was kind of a unique film in its own way, but it was also filled with flaws, a lot of montages, musical sequences–there were far too many."

Do you remember Goin' Down the Road? 51 years later, it still stands one of Canada's most notable feature films, one that followed two Canadians from the Maritimes (located on the Atlantic coast) that migrate from Cape Breton Island to Toronto for the perceived better opportunities in jobs and the bright lights only to find hard truths. It was the debut feature film of Toronto native Donald Shebib, who was once quoted as saying the basic premise was to make a film about folks most people wouldn't care for, stating that "The young twenty-five-year-old hip kids that went to see the film wouldn’t spend the time of day speaking to those and neither would I, but they like them in the film.” Shebib had spent over a decade in film that started with his study at the the UCLA School of Theater, Film and Television in 1961 that had followed his study of sociology and history at the University of Toronto. His study there got him close to a classmate that soon became involved in film production with Francis Ford Coppola, and Shebib worked as a cinematographer and assistant editor on Dementia 13 (1962); Shebib started to do his own short films around this time. After graduating in 1965, he returned home to do work with the National Film Board of Canada and CBC Television in documentary filmmaking (which received notice, although little of his work is readily available); it was his experience seeing his cousin try to make a living in Toronto from Cape Breton that had shaped the film's creation, one made on a crew of four people on $25,000 that starred Doug McGrath, Paul Bradley, Jayne Eastwood, and Cayle Chernina that Shebib co-wrote with William Fruet. Shebib has directed ten feature films (with another in post-production), but Goin' Down the Road is generally the movie he is most remembered for (much to his surprise, since he did not expect it to get any commercial distribution), and it is considered one of the most seminal films for Canadian cinema.

Perhaps it makes sense that clips from the film are used throughout this one (one just a bit shorter than the original at 84 minutes). Shebib was inspired to make a follow-up after years of cajoling (mostly from Chernin, who passed away from ovarian cancer three months after filming), and he wanted to make a film that touched people and prove something to Canadians, in part because he has gone on record for his distaste for Canadian films for their "boring quality" at times; Bradley had died in 2003, and Shebib uses the death of his character to shape the plot for this feature. Surely he wanted to make an interesting bookend by way of making a movie that resembles something made for television with the capability for twists like a melodrama, for which it serves as a fill-in-the-blank for things you either wanted to know or didn't from before in the original - albeit with a lessened blow in its ending. Obviously it is a better-made film in terms of its look (four decades will do that), and the acting is just as fine as it was before (i.e. not awards bait), and it certainly tries to pull at the strings left hanging from before with reasoning - the result is an okay movie that either gives you enough of the answers that Shebib urges to reach or it seems unnecessary to really find out. Honestly, some things are easier to leave buried, but whatever, at least it is Shebib behind the wheel and not someone else, much like a reunion between old friends that doesn't end in passive boredom or worse. Look, if you want to see what happens to folks that ran off to Vancouver for a new start after they assaulted a clerk and left a wife and child, the result will have some payoff that makes it more than just an epilogue or a letdown. McGrath is wry and wistful enough in his balance of looking to the past and the present without becoming a shell of himself in the process - he makes the mark he wants to make without trouble in a bucket list road movie. There is a spark in Robertson that does elicit some interesting moments when paired with McGrath when it comes to tender amusement in chemistry for a time. Lemke comes around in the middle, used for the other turn of the narrative for exposition (particularly with the ending, which is drawn out pretty silly). Eastwood and Chernin accompany the film for a few scenes in providing perspective without turning into the peanut gallery. Moore is the last piece of the puzzle, playing someone affected by Alzheimer's disease, and the performance generally works out without trouble. At any rate, what we have is a decent return for all involved, one that tugs at the strings of the past without becoming strung along too tight to forge its own pattern. The passage of time ages us all, and there can be certain moments of the past that will arise at times for us to encounter once again, whether that means a bad breakup or a decision made in the name of supposed friendship. It is our reaction to it (whether one is haunted or ready to the memory presented) that makes growing up who we are. In other words, the truth always comes out, and it's our job to react accordingly to it. For a film like this, I would say it comes up just enough in the right direction to make it fairly worth what could have been a forgettable affair (or worse a letdown), one that Shebib can say accompanies his previous film and vision. There are quite a few sequels that commit the sin of just not living up to what was done before, but at least this Canadian one does what it can to make it a worthwhile affair.

Well, here we are in July. Honestly, I had intended to return to somewhat regular tradition of a Canada Day feature for Movie Night, but I ended up having to hold it a day because of timing (i.e. I didn't want to rush a review before work). Inadvertently, this is actually an anniversary review, because Goin' Down the Road made its premiere on July 2, 1970 (the sequel was released in October 2011, but that's a horror month, man). There had been rumblings about doing this movie for a few years (because even I eventually sneak up on sequels or spinoffs being made), but the Tribute to the Decades project took off and ran right over anything for July beyond the 1980s. As always, hope for a surprise when it comes to Movie Night, because the best plans are always improvised for writing...

Overall, I give it 7 out of 10 stars.

original image:


July 17, 2020

Pale Rider.

Review #1476: Pale Rider.

Cast:
Clint Eastwood (The Preacher), Michael Moriarty (Hull Barret), Carrie Snodgress (Sarah Wheeler), Richard Dysart (Coy LaHood), Chris Penn (Josh LaHood), Sydney Penny (Megan Wheeler), John Russell (Marshal Stockburn), Richard Kiel (Club), Doug McGrath (Spider Conway), Chuck Lafont (Eddie Conway), and Jeffrey Weissman (Teddy Conway) Produced and Directed by Clint Eastwood (#1252 - Space Cowboys and #1310 - Million Dollar Baby)

Review:
"You have to trust your instincts. There's a moment when an actor has it, and he knows it. Behind the camera you can feel the moment even more clearly. And once you've got it, once you feel it, you can't second-guess yourself. You can find a million reasons why something didn't work. But if it feels right, and it looks right, it works. Without sounding like a pseudointellectual dipshit, it's my responsibility to be true to myself. If it works for me, it's right."

Clint Eastwood has cultivated a unique and prolific career for himself over half of a century. Ther have been quite a bit of actors who have become stars in both television and film, but there have not been as many actors who have also sprung into star directors. Eastwood has had a breakthrough project in each decade since the 1950s, whether that involves television (Rawhide, 1959-65), starring roles (The Dollars Trilogy, Dirty Harry), or directing (debuting with Play Misty for Me (1971), the first of over thirty films), with influence coming from directors he had worked with such as Sergio Leone and Don Siegel with a quick pace. The Western certainly had declined in stature for the 1980s, but Pale Rider was certainly a high point for its decade (being one of the most profitable Westerns released for that era). This was the third Western directed by Eastwood and his first since The Outlaw Josey Wales (1976), and it certainly isn't the first of him playing a nameless and mystical drifter (such as with High Plains Drifter over a decade earlier). In general, the film seems to cover ground that was done with Shane (1953), which also had a stranger that came into a town wracked with intimidation over settlers by a baron and his minions that soon escalates into hiring a gunfighter to combat the stranger (in this case, a group of marshals), and the stranger leaves town after it has been settled to stay with its settlers. Of course there are quite a few differences between the two (namely in gold miners as opposed to homesteaders), with the most key being in the quiet details of this film, which has a mystical quality to its title hero, practically seeming like a ghost when engaging in action (which Eastwood subsequently confirmed). In that sense, it makes for an interesting experience of 116 minutes with careful precision. No matter how familiar one is with Eastwood as an actor or director, it isn't too much of a stretch to enjoy what we see without feeling like one is watching a greatest hits Western or something without a competent athmosphere and support to go with it. Eastwood may always grit his way through a role, but it doesn't mean he can't be curious to view regardless, a sardonic presence of careful words. The others prove fairly adept with making this small town setting come forward with careful interest. Moriarty proves an affiable leader of the folks with calmness. Snodgrass and Penny do fine when paired with others, while Dysart and Penn make fair adversaries to view involving greed. Russell (known for his work in the TV show Lawman) makes for a useful presence of old eyes that carry menace. The film proves diverting in its own look upon the mysterious stranger lurking on the frontier with its own kind of mythic nature that make a quietly effective time - whether in thinking about a man we see with bullet holes in the back at first glance or in how he operates with these folks without really needing to show much of himself and cut the ambiguity. There is always a place for a Western that wants to cover a frontier worth looing upon, and this is a fair film in its genre that sets itself up well with atmosphere and a cast worth viewing at least once for its era.

Overall, I give it 8 out of 10 stars.

March 6, 2018

Porky's.


Review #1055: Porky's.

Cast: 
Dan Monahan (Edward "Pee Wee" Morris), Mark Herrier (Billy McCarty), Wyatt Knight (Tommy Turner), Roger Wilson (Mickey Jarvis), Cyril O'Reilly (Tim Cavanaugh), Tony Ganios (Anthony "Meat" Tuperello), Kaki Hunter (Wendy Williams), Kim Cattrall (Miss Lynn "Lassie" Honeywell), Nancy Parsons (Coach Beulah Balbricker), Scott Colomby (Brian Schwartz), Boyd Gaines (Coach Roy Brackett), Doug McGrath (Coach Fred Warren), and Chuck Mitchell (Porky Wallace) Directed by Bob Clark (#020 - A Christmas Story and #679 - Black Christmas)

Review: 
Admittedly, I am not the biggest watcher of teen comedies. Aside from a few exceptions (Ferris Bueller's Day Off, Fast Times at Ridgemont High, Superbad), this is generally a genre I'm not all too big with, although I'll say that at least I went into this film with an open mind, trying to not give this movie a hard time on purpose. In any case, this is a raunchy kind of teen flick that didn't really click with me all too well, although I can at least recognize its influence for other teen comedies, for better or for worse. The characters are vaguely memorable, but I didn't really find anybody to be really that funny, particularly since nobody looks/sounds like teenagers to begin with. The standout for me is Chuck Mitchell, who (despite being billed deep into the credits) plays Porky with the right kind of intimidation and sleazy nature that works in the short amount of time he's on screen, being the right kind of pig in a farm of mild-leveled ferrets trying to make you laugh. For me, the situations didn't really click for me, whether it was the main plot or the parts with other characters because the cliches feel smarmy this time around.

The film is vulgar and gross, but it isn't something that you would be surprised by, with one or two funny gags throughout. Director Bob Clark based off incidents from his time of growing up in high school and college for the film, and while I can't say they make for very funny instances, I will at least credit him for trying to make a film that looks like something a teenager could relate to. I can't get mad at something that is low bar if it aims for it intentionally. The film was shot in Florida, but it was produced by a Canadian company, Astral Bellevue Pathe Inc, with the success of the film meaning that it is the most successful "Canadian" film of all time. Like it or hate it, Porky's manages to both attract and repel audiences based on its content and weirdness. I can't really endorse it, but I also can't condemn it for being the film it wants to be, so I'd say it is something that could pique your interest if you're in the state of mind for it.

Overall, I give it 5 out of 10 stars.

December 22, 2014

Movie Night: Black Christmas (1974).


Review #679: Black Christmas.

Cast
Olivia Hussey (Jess), Keir Dullea (Peter), Margot Kidder (Barb), John Saxon (Lt. Fuller), Marian Waldman (Mrs. Mac), Andrea Martin (Phyllis), James Edmond (Mr. Harrison), Doug McGrath (Sergeant Nash), Art Hindle (Chris), and Lynne Griffin (Clare) Directed by Bob Clark (#020 - A Christmas Story)

Review
Yes, the same Bob Clark who directed A Christmas Story (a movie that admittedly has its own weirdness to it) directed a movie called one of the first slasher films, Black Christmas. And hey, it's a "Christmas film" along with being a Canadian film as well. I guess surprises come in threes. But is the movie any good? Yea, I suppose so. This is a chilly little film that uses perspective from the killer and some pretty odd phone calls to make for a spooky little slasher film. The highlight for me though is Margot Kidder, who certainly seems like she's having a good time even if half of the time she is...inebriated. What is unique is the fact that the killer isn't revealed, not even at the end, as the movie ends ambiguously, all in part because Bob Clark decided to. The killer isn't really shown, but by using perspective and a voice (or two, probably), it makes for a creative way of delivering scares without having to adhere to the cliches too much. And hey, it's another movie with John Saxon, who as always is a rough but watchable authority figure. It's been 40 years since this film has been released, and it has had a remake but even now this film has a cult following and I can understand why. What we have here is a stellar movie that even inspired Halloween and Friday the 13th, which is like a sign of respect, I believe. Watch the movie, and then make sure to check the caller ID on your phone.

Overall, I give it 8 out of 10 stars.

July 1, 2013

Movie Night: Goin' Down the Road.

Review #408: Goin' Down the Road.

Cast
Doug McGrath (Peter McGraw), Paul Bradley (Joey Mayle), Jayne Eastwood (Betty), Cayle-Lorraine Sinclair (Selina), Nicole Morin (Nicole), and Pierre La Roche (Frenchie La Roche) Directed by Donald Shebib.

Review
Goin' Down the Road feels like a documentary with its film style but it doesn't sugarcoat the characters, it doesn't try to overly happy, it nearly borders on depressing, but it is cohesive and it does manage to tell a useful story. The acting blends in with the film tone, rugged, but useful, This isn't a cheery little optimistic film; it tries to deliver lessons that uses Canada in the landscape to give more of a feeling and more of an edge to the film. The directing is alright, as this film flows well and it also runs well, not going on too long or too short. This is a really good film, and Canada should be proud of this film, for all that it is worth in its emotion and all of its pride, which is something to say about.

Can Canada succeed once again? (This is Part III of my four film review special for Canada Day 2013).
Overall, I give it 9 out of 10 stars.

original image: