Showing posts with label Jackie Cooper. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jackie Cooper. Show all posts

July 31, 2023

Skippy.

Review #2064: Skippy.

Cast: 
Jackie Cooper (Skippy Skinner), Robert Coogan (Sooky Wayne), Mitzi Green (Eloise), Jackie Searl (Sidney), Willard Robertson (Dr. Herbert Skinner), Enid Bennett (Mrs. Ellen Skinner), Donald Haines (Harley Nubbins), Jack Rube Clifford (Mr. Nubbins, Dog-Catcher), Helen Jerome Eddy (Mrs. Wayne), and Guy Oliver (Dad Burkey) Directed by Norman Taurog (#421 - Palm Springs Weekend, #523 - It Happened at the World's Fair, and #1174 - Dr. Goldfoot and the Bikini Machine)

Review: 
The career of Norman Taurog really is a double-edged sword if you think about it. He was familiar with performances from a child as he entered that realm on the stage while being raised in his native Chicago. He appeared in off-Broadway for a number of years before he entered the film industry in collaboration with Larry Semon that saw him direct for the first time in 1920. He eventually graduated from shorts to features by the end of the decade with Lucky Boy (1929), which actually had a few portions of dialogue. By the time of Skippy (1931), Taurog was already a veteran of half-a-dozen films that clearly would serve him well as a recipent of an Academy Award. Yes, well, here we are with the film that saw him awarded one for Best Director that happened in the year of such films as Cimarron, The Front Page and Morocco (well, it only was the fourth ceremony held). As such, the film starred his nephew in Jackie Cooper for the title role after he had started appearing (read: dragged by his grandmother) in films at the age of 3, which resulted in a spell spent with Our Gang before Paramount borrowed him here. If you ever want to see just what kind of differences exist between the past and now when it comes to treating actors, Cooper shared just Taurog got him to cry, as related by his autobiography years later. When one sequence couldn't get the right amount of tears, Taurog chewed him out as a ham and called for the spare costume to be put on Robert Coogan. The next time that a scene was needed in tears, now again incurring the wrath of Taurog in not being able to cry on cue, decided to have someone take away Cooper's dog that he had with him on set. But that isn't all, he proceeded to have a security guard come up with a gun and make it seem like the guard shot the dog, which naturally led Cooper into hysterics; of course, if Cooper did the scene the way Taurog wanted in calmness, he could go see if the dog was possibly alive (well, the dog wasn't shot, but of course the real key to getting Cooper to cry a third time was far simpler: his mother talked him through the scene in why he would need to cry). Of course, Cooper has also stated that Taurog essentially was a contradiction: he called him both an effective director among the ones he could compare in making films but he also was a tough figure for a kid that basically suffered abuse from their grandmother. One would say, however, that Cooper thankfully ended up more fortunate than others of his time, which included a lengthy run on television, both as actor and director (coincidentally, Glamour Boy, made a decade after this film, saw him star as a has-been child star that even referred to "Skippy" for its promos). As for Taurog, by the time he retired in 1968, he had directed roughly 180 feature films, which included directing for stars such as Spencer Tracy, Dean Martin, Elvis Presley, and beyond.

Amidst all of that is the fact that this was based on the comic strip of the same name, as created by Percy Crosby in 1923, which served as an inspiration for Charles Schultz's Peanuts (if you would like to fall down the rabbit hole of where Crosby ended up, well, try this out) As such, the film was written by Norman Z. McLeod and Joseph L. Mankiewicz (both future directors) in screenplay, while Don Marquis provides additional dialogue, and Sam Mintz provided the story. There was a sequel with many of the same people returning in Sooky in the winter of 1931. What it all boils down to for this film is a a film threatening to choke in schmaltz that thankfully is at least endearing enough in the overall result to make it more than just a dated feature. It packs a bit of a punch in melodrama that will at least make one not have to spring a defense of a silly children's movie being, well, "made exclusively for children".  It is Cooper who holds his own, a testament to solid timing and, well, the aforementioned treatment during production; the last crying scene (the one that wasn't conjured up with tricks) might actually be the most effective, showing just what really matters to a kid when they think about life that seems like it could go forever. Crosby once described the character as "the child in my soul", and it isn't hard to see how Cooper makes that seem engaging and useful for child adventure. A weaker presence would've been the last straw in an otherwise okay movie with characters that possess the amount of dimensions expected for such a simple-to-the-point story.  Coogan (brother of the noted Jackie) is, well, I can give slack for a six-year-old, so go with that (Green does some sort of goofy yodel on occasion that is, well, embarrassing for any teen). The adults are about what you'd expect in mild-mannered foils, so there's that. As a whole, what does one expect from a film about kids trying to deal with shantytown shutdowns and trying to raise $6 (adjusted for inflation, that's about $100 today) to buy a windshield and save a dog from death? Well, you will get a film that shows its age along with a heart on its sleeve with an ideal (if not semi-coerced) performance from Cooper to make it all worth a viewing for those into curiosity for this sort of film.

Overall, I give it 7 out of 10 stars.

March 26, 2016

Superman IV: The Quest for Peace.


Review #787: Superman IV: The Quest for Peace.

Cast
Christopher Reeve (Superman / Clark Kent), Gene Hackman (Lex Luthor / voice of Nuclear Man)
Jackie Cooper (Perry White), Margot Kidder (Lois Lane), Jon Cryer (Lenny Luthor), Mark Pillow (Nuclear Man), Sam Wanamaker (David Warfield), Marc McClure (Jimmy Olsen), Mariel Hemingway (Lacy Warfield), and Damian McLawhorn (Jeremy) Directed by Sidney J. Furie.

Review
Simply put, this movie is terrible. Any which way you look at it, the movie fails at every level, from failing as a superhero movie to failing to make a plot or direction that works to failing be a movie of spectacle or excitement. To make a long review of this movie would be redundant, but a basic criticism will suffice for such a basic movie. The first (and easiest) flaw to notice is the opening credits, which are representative of both the cheapness of the production studio (Cannon Films) and the harbinger of a movie that goes downhill from there. As usual, Reeve (who contributed to the story for the film) does a fine job, and Hackman returns to make for an entertaining Luthor once again, but neither can save a movie bogged down by terrible, terrible film-making not just from directing, but from a (chopped-down) budget that can't support what the movie wanted to be. The effects are the ultimate final blow, with easily visible strings, a shot of Reeve "flying" towards the camera being repeated numerous times, and numerous other examples of futile attempts at penny pinching. At least Cooper, Kidder and McClure are back, though they don't really very interested in the movie, much like the rest of us. The less said about Cryer, the better. Nuclear Man is certainly a strange villain, looking like he was time-warped from the early 80's, especially with the silver nails, and the fact that he is voiced by Hackman is somewhat off-putting. The fights between him and Superman are downright laughable, and the solution to defeating him via moving the moon in front of the sun is the only perfect way to end such a silly climax.

What is interesting in all of this is the amount of footage that was cut from the movie. Originally, the movie was over 2 hours long, but due to a bad test screening, Furie cut over 30 minutes out of the movie, with a good portion of those scenes (but apparently not all of them) later resurfacing on DVD many years later. Almost all of them have a bit of degradation to them, and scenes meant to show special effects (such as one scene where Superman rescues a child from a tornado) are unfinished, and even the final intended scene, with Superman and Jeremy (a child who wrote him a letter wanting him to intervene in possible war) flying over the Earth isn't finished, with a red glow effect on them.

In the end, the movie has no hope, no substance, no luck, and most of all no budget, proving to be the death knell of the movie franchise for 19 years. I'd recommend the movie as a guide on what not to do with regards to budgeting, editing, and most importantly, presentation.

Overall, I give it 4 out of 10 stars.

March 24, 2016

Superman III.


Review #786: Superman III.

Cast
Christopher Reeve (Clark Kent / Superman), Richard Pryor (Gus Gorman), Robert Vaughn (Ross Webster), Annette O'Toole (Lana Lang), Annie Ross (Vera Webster), Pamela Stephenson (Lorelei Ambrosia), Jackie Cooper (Perry White), Margot Kidder (Lois Lane), Marc McClure as (Jimmy Olsen), and Gavan O'Herlihy (Brad Wilson) Directed by Richard Lester (#541 - A Hard Day's Night, #594 - A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Forum, and #785 - Superman II)

Review
There is nothing wrong with a bit of humor and/or slapstick. Some comic book movies even excel at moments of lightness in otherwise good films. Superman III is not one of those movies. It's a sad, desperate attempt of trying so hard to be both that it manages to fail at every turn. It's hard to tell when the first cracks appear, but it could be argued that it's either when Richard Pryor first appears, or when the title sequence is shamelessly put on the bottom of the screen so we can all see some slapstick immediately after Pryor shows up. Afterwards, the movie goes up and down from there. Reeve is the best part of the movie, carrying the movie even when you know it's already past the point of no return. He even gets to play a Superman who (briefly) becomes weakened by synthetic kryptonite (just go with it) and becomes...a Superman who fixes the Tower of Pisa and even drinks some alcohol (while flicking peanuts at beer bottles). It's a ridiculous aspect of the movie, but it gives Reeve something to do amidst the Pryor parts that really take up nearly 45% of the film. There's even a scene where the two "Supermans" fight each other, which while being ridiculous (especially in how it ends), is actually pretty interesting to watch.

The new villain this time around is played by Robert Vaughn, but he doesn't really stick out too much, coming off as a Lex Luthor stand-in. O'Toole is the new leading lady (by that I mean for only this film), and while she is relatively decent, she isn't given much to do, as compared to Kidder...who is essentially put on a bus early on. And then of course there's Richard Pryor. He's not inherently terrible, and he is somewhat funny, but he doesn't really feel like he should be in a Superman film. For most of the movie he is on the side of the villain(s), but the second that Superman is in actual danger, he switches sides, and it comes off as a dull surprise. The only thing that surprised me is the computer "robotizing" one of the characters near the end, but of course it's not permanent, so whatever (by the way, how does a computer who is supposed to know Superman's weaknesses not realize how a certain acid gets volatile under intense heat? Actually, forget it, the movie still stinks). The movie's biggest flaw is that there really is no spectacle to any of it. You never really care about anything that goes on, and nothing sticks out in this movie that you truly remember as a good thing. The main idea behind the movie isn't terrible, but the execution falls flat on its face.

Overall, I give it 5 out of 10 stars.

March 20, 2016

Superman II.


Review #785: Superman II.

Cast
Christopher Reeve (Clark Kent / Superman), Gene Hackman (Lex Luthor), Margot Kidder (Lois Lane), Terence Stamp (General Zod), Jackie Cooper (Perry White), Sarah Douglas (Ursa), Jack O'Halloran (Non), Ned Beatty (Otis), Valerie Perrine (Eve Teschmacher), Marc McClure (Jimmy Olsen), Susannah York (Lara), Clifton James (Sheriff), and E.G. Marshall (The President) Directed by Richard Lester (#541 - A Hard Day's Night and #594 - A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Forum)

Review
If you're interested in the review, skip this paragraph, as it does not pertain to the review, merely serving as a little bit of background...

If you remember my review from two years ago of the original Superman movie (#547), I had said that it was a fine epic that succeeded in nearly every way possible, with the most important being that it was entertaining. Naturally, the movie was a success, and Superman II (which had been filmed simultaneously with the first film) would soon follow...but not with Richard Donner, who was "replaced" from the film by the Salkinds producers a few months after the first film's release. Richard Lester was tasked to finish the film. The dispute over what footage of the movie is Donner's and so on continued for years, with a "Richard Donner Cut" made in 2006 that tried to restore (as much as possible) footage that Donner had shot, though he was not involved with that cut.

With all that in mind, Superman II still manages to be a decent sequel. While it isn't up to the same craft as the first film, Superman II is as least entertaining enough to work. The movie has elements of humor that veer into slapstick (no doubt added by Lester), which admittedly gets in the way of enjoying my favorite part of the movie: The climatic fight with Superman and Zod, Ursa & Non. While it is a good fight that takes up the last 30 (or so) minutes of the movie, it is marred by random aspects. One example is Superman throwing his emblem shield at Non, which mystifies me on the level of practicality. Reeve and Kidder do have good chemistry together once again, and the romance is at least watchable, even despite the fact that Superman can just erase memories with a kiss (if he chooses to, I suppose), which makes for a peculiar (if not extremely inevitable) reset. The movie takes time to get going in the sense that it is more fun with Zod and the others around. The effects, while a bit peculiar at times, fit the movie well enough. Stamp certainly makes for a standout villain in the sense that there finally is a villain who can match to the physical strength of Superman, alongside the fact that Stamp is entertaining to watch, especially when asking someone to kneel. I wish that the idea of Superman taking his powers away in favor of being with Lois could have been more than just a five minute blip that just passes through and is nearly forgotten, right up to the end, anyway. I do find it interesting that at the end of the movie, Superman beats up a trucker (the one who had beaten him up while he was temporarily human), because...I guess Superman really felt that he needed to get some sort of retribution. Superman II is a sequel that has its bogging flaws, but it shines just enough with charm and a little bit of magic to work.

As for the sequel...next time.

Overall, I give it 8 out of 10 stars.

February 23, 2014

Movie Night: Superman (1978).


Review #547: Superman.

Cast
Marlon Brando (Jor-El), Gene Hackman (Lex Luthor), Christopher Reeve (Clark Kent/Superman), Margot Kidder (Lois Lane), Ned Beatty (Otis), Jackie Cooper (Perry White), Glenn Ford (Jonathan Kent), Valerie Perrine (Eve Teschmacher), Phyllis Thaxter (Martha Kent), Trevor Howard (First Elder), Maria Schell (Vond-Ah), and Terence Stamp (General Zod) Directed by Richard Donner (#075 - Scrooged, #355 - Lethal Weapon, and #356 - Lethal Weapon 2)

Review
Of all the comic book movies I've done on this...show, I suppose, the one glaring omission has been the Superman franchise. Superman was the first major superhero feature movie made (Side note here: There had been three serials made before this movie, such as Superman (1948), Atom Man vs. Superman (1950), and Superman and the Mole Men (1951), along with animated shorts made by Fleischer Studios, a radio and television series), and the movie's success would lead to more superhero films. But anyway, how is the film itself? Let's start with the actors. Brando does well for the small amount of time he has, and his speech to his newborn son is effective, but also powerful. Hackman is a decent villain, he does pair well with Beatty, who isn't half bad in a supporting role. Christopher Reeve is just perfect in both roles, managing to act well enough to make these two personalities stand out effectively. Kidder is good, she pairs off well with Reeve, and the scene where Superman takes Lane on a flight is a really good scene that only shows the emotion the movie has. The movie has excellent effects and manages to tell a good story with only a few bumps along the way. The ending either makes Superman's character fully defined...or a cop out that is actually more confusing in how it works then infuriating. I think it's more of both, it defines that Clark/Superman is here for a reason, a point mentioned by Kent's adoptive father, in contrast to Jor-El's warning about changing history. Superman finds his destiny, and it does make sense, though the time traveling part boggles my mind. Endings aside, the movie is a fine epic that succeeds in nearly everyway possible.

Overall, I give it 9 out of 10 stars.