Showing posts with label David Andrews. Show all posts
Showing posts with label David Andrews. Show all posts

July 2, 2023

Redux: Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines.

Redux #089: Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines.

Cast: 
Arnold Schwarzenegger (The Terminator), Nick Stahl (John Connor), Kristanna Loken (T-X), Claire Danes (Kate Brewster), David Andrews (Lieutenant General Robert Brewster), Mark Famiglietti (Scott Mason), and Earl Boen (Dr. Peter Silberman) Directed by Jonathan Mostow.

Review: 
From my review on January 25, 2012: 
This is a film I had forgotten to review a while long ago (man that sounds redundant), and so I will do it justice. As such, let us see if this film is any better then the two before it. And in a few words it is not so. It's a decent film, as it has action to entertain you. The plot is not as interesting as the first two, but the film at least doesn't make that happen on purpose. It tries hard to revive the series, and it succeeds. The film isn't as good as the first two, but it is at least decent. This film basically sells all that the first two did in story all to just to revive this franchise, So...We have 3 films in which the Terminator is our real hero, and now we have a fourth on our hands. Who's the hero? Batman? Oh wait, that Batman...What's the name? Salvation. Huh. Fitting title, isn't it? This ends Part IV of Robot Week.
On July 2, 2003, the third film of The Terminator series seeped into theaters. You may remember Terminator 2: Judgement Day had come out in 1991, twelve years prior. James Cameron had made it with the idea that it would be the end of the series. Of course, he didn't own the franchise, but even he had an interest in doing another film by the time he was behind the studio park attraction T2-3D: Battle Across Time in 1996. The bankruptcy of Carolco Pictures created a conundrum of who would own what eventually led to Mario F. Kassar and Andrew G. Vajna spearheading an effort to make a third film (which meant paying its key star a good deal of money) rather than 20th Century Fox or Cameron. Schwarzenegger thought about rejecting the film before he was convinced by Cameron that if they had a good script idea and a ton of cash to pay, "don't think twice". The first draft was done by Tedi Serafian in 1999. In 2001, Jonathan Mostow was recruited to direct the film on the heels of his first two features as writer and director) that received attention with Breakdown (1997) and U-571 (2000). Right after he was brought in, he sought the help of Michael Ferris and John Brancato, a screenwriting duo that had also went to Harvard University with Mostow (the most noted of the screenplays written by Ferris and Brancato is probably The Game (1997)). While he knew that there would be immense skepticism towards the idea of a third film, he felt that the best way to disarm those people would be to make the choice to use humor, for which he has stated that some parts have not aged quite well with time. With a budget over $150 million, the film was a general success, although a fourth Terminator film would not come out until 2009, as done by new owner of the series in The Halcyon Company with an entirely new cast while Ferris and Brancato were kept as one of numerous writers.

Truthfully, I feel more of an obligation to look back on films with milestones now more than ever to see just what I got right and wrong within my perceptions years ago. I didn't really have doubts about the first two Terminator films, those reviews were most re-done because I felt like it. But I was curious to see what I would feel about the third film, which is now twenty years old and is generally felt to be the peak for Schwarzenegger as an action star. One month after the release of the film, he made a run for the recall race for Governor of the State of California, which, well, he won. It is evident quickly that the movie is looking to be an entertaining movie in scale to make up for the obvious fact that it is the third film of a series where the last two are basically the best thing one could ever hope to make with the series. Of course, there is one other thing that sticks out to me when compared to the other two, but more on that in a bit. Honestly, I had a fear that I would think the film as too good to be true the next time seeing it. Hell, what do you know, I found it to be a delightful feature that might as well serve as the true example of a big-budget B-movie in all of its odd characteristics. The best of these are ones that don't shy away in embarrassment. Schwarzenegger was actually 55 at the time of the release of this film, but he still has the chops required to pull off the beat of "kicking ass" while also providing a bit of levity (shtick or not). Stahl was cast after a bit of time was spent in preproduction with original T2 star Edward Furlong only to see him deal with personal issues that had him leave. I think he does pretty well here, all things considered. There is a soulfulness needed to convey the tension of this character that is seen here as drifting aimlessly until fate steps in. He grows in to a role that is not so much about relating to Schwarzenegger again like the previous film but instead about relating to getting a grip beyond despair and moving forward. Danes makes a quality piece of the traveling trio, wrapped in a panicked and weary timing that obviously merits watching in further movies with screen time.  Loken says fairly little by the halfway point, which means a good deal of stone-faced watching for a role that makes for fairly decent menace when considering that the role probably has a body count comparable to a slasher. 

I enjoy the movie as a spectacle because it does keep momentum within its chase in a time where there was still practical use for staging and stunts that tries to keep everything wrapped under two hours. The sequence where one has to convince the other to not fail their mission (namely by killing them) is a fairly neat sequence to stand well before the climax, although obviously the initial chase is a good one as well. The climax ends where else but by having the world get nuked. Oh, yeah, it does that. Actually that is probably the best way to end the film and maybe set up another one, just clean the slate and establish, that, well, maybe there was a time for one to make a fate for themselves, but that some things are just inevitably over. The third Terminator film can't handle a comparison to the previous two Cameron films, but who honestly can? It still makes a quality blockbuster venture that saw its star get one more glow in the spotlight and deliver some entertaining spectacle for those who care for that sort of thing, which makes it all worth it.

Overall, I give it 7 out of 10 stars.

May 31, 2018

Stealth.


Review #1089: Stealth.

Cast: 
Josh Lucas (Lt. Ben "Big" Gannon), Jessica Biel (Lt. Kara "Guns" Wade), Jamie Foxx (Lt. Henry "E-Z" Purcell), Sam Shepard (Capt. George Cummings), Joe Morton (Capt. Dick Marshfield), Richard Roxburgh (Dr. Keith Orbit), Ian Bliss (Lt. Aaron Shaftsbury), Ebon Moss-Bachrach (Tim), David Andrews (Ray), and Wentworth Miller (EDI) Directed by Rob Cohen (#043 - The Fast and the Furious and #924 - The Boy Next Door)

Review: 
For a movie that is called "Stealth", the film's only real secret is that it is terrible within the first twenty minutes. From its preposterous plot to the underplayed characters that are followed up by equally underplayed acting, this film was a notable failure upon original release, making just over half of its reported budget of $135 million dollars. It would seem they put more thought into spending money for the effects than anything else, for the movie's detriment as it turns out. The effects aren't terrible, but there isn't a moment where you really feel the need to appreciate what is being shown on screen, with the action sequences being the worst offenders at this, feeling like bad cut-scenes that never cease to try and stymie the eyeballs. I was reminded of Broken Arrow (1996), a film I covered five years ago, while watching this flick - and that is not a compliment, seeing how that one was actually more riveting in comparison, where even Top Gun (1986) would be embarrassed at this thing. The movie uses the "set in the near future" excuse as a way to try and throw lingo (such as quantum computing) and the concept of AI, which is even more amusing if one has seen 2001: A Space Odyssey and its version of AI with HAL 9000, which was thought of in the 1960s as opposed to the 21st century like with Stealth, with the AI here seemingly placed to make it seem a little less like a generic action film and more like a generic science fiction action movie, but there is no way that any sane person would consider this sci-fi. This is more the kind of movie you would reject for $1 at the pawn shop than a worthwhile thing to watch.

There is something about this movie can't generate excitement beyond a chuckle at how over-the-top it presents itself that makes it a chore from start to finish. The acting is the nail in the coffin for this film, with our main trio of Lucas-Biel-Foxx being ridiculous to follow through with, in part because their characters are relentlessly generic and none of them are really up to the task of elevating them to watchability. The closest to entertainment value is Foxx, who has a few moments of amusement. Lucas and Biel have zero chemistry with each other, and they equally add zero charisma to these roles, coming off as boring people to follow that aren't entertaining even in the action sequences. Shepard doesn't do too bad, but the film seems to be beneath him, reminding me of how much more fun I had with him in The Right Stuff (1983). The most amusing voice is Miller, playing the "rogue AI", a trope that you can see coming nearly five minutes after he is first introduced. The plot is all over the place with stuff that you can readily expect and stuff that you wouldn't dare expect, but the most amusing aspect is a line of dialogue referring to the AI, in that it apparently downloaded all of the songs from the web. Yes, an rogue AI that not only goes against commands but also is a pirate of music companies. Oh, the horror. Trying to analyze the film or tear down its flaws piece by piece would be just as exhausting as watching the movie, only less time-consuming. By the time the film has the gall to end with a post-credits scene, you will have already started the process of trying to forget what you have seen, in the hope that it won't bore you to death any further than it already has in its 121 minute run-time. Even as a bad flick, it isn't enjoyably bad, managing to be a relentlessly dull and plodding piece of dreck.

Overall, I give it 3 out of 10 stars.