Showing posts with label Otto Lederer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Otto Lederer. Show all posts

January 23, 2020

The Jazz Singer.


Review #1326: The Jazz Singer.

Cast: 
Al Jolson (Jakie Rabinowitz / Jack Robin), Warner Oland (Cantor Rabinowitz), Eugenie Besserer (Sara Rabinowitz), May McAvoy (Mary Dale), Otto Lederer (Moisha Yudelson), Richard Tucker (Harry Lee), and Yossele Rosenblatt (Himself) Directed by Alan Crosland.

Review: 
Some films are just born to endure forever. When it comes to the transition from silent to sound in Hollywood's golden age, this film is often marked as the dawn of a new era and of a new genre - the musical. This was the first feature-length film where you could hear someone talk alongside music in the background. The film was adapted from the play of the same name by Samson Raphaelson (which he had adapted from his short story "The Day of Atonement" based on Jolson's real life) from Alfred A. Cohn as a Warner Bros. production through the Vitaphone sound-on-disc system. One thing I should make clear is that this is not the first time anyone heard any kind of sound in a film before. Several short films had dialogue present before 1927, and the studio had utilized the Vitaphone system for a synchronized musical score and sound effects with Don Juan (1926). D. W. Griffith's Dream Street (1921) had a single singing sequence alongside crowd noises with its Photokinema sound-on-disc system, including an introduction sequence of the director speaking to the audience, although not many theaters showed this due to not having the system installed. Sound-on-disc was the uses of phonograph (or an other disc) to record or play back sound that synced with a motion picture through a interlock with the movie projector. It wasn't as if sound film was a new idea that Warner Bros. did alone - the Fox Film Corporation had bought their own system in Fox Movietone, utilizing it first with Sunrise (1927) that included music and sound effects, which they used for motion pictures until 1931 and their newsreel service until 1939.

In the end, sound-on-film would become the standard for talking pictures by the time the 1930s were over, when studios didn't need to produce sound and silent versions of films anymore. Warner Brothers had started in 1923 from the creation of four brothers: Harry, Albert, Sam, and Jack Warner, with the first three having emigrated as young kids from Poland to Canada. They had started their careers involved with film through the movie theater business, having a movie projector that they could use to show film, which led them to their first theater in 1903 with the Cascade. They soon grew onto distribution and production by the time they formally incorporated their company in 1923. When it comes to the moment one needs to hear a voice, the film certainly does not disappoint, doing so seventeen minutes in with the famous line of "Wait a minute, wait a minute, you ain't heard nothin' yet". This of course is preceded by a few songs and caption cards, since the film is mostly a silent production, with just two minutes of synchronized talking. Jolson certainly seems in his element when it comes to singing, for which he has six songs. Jolson wasn't once dubbed "The World's Greatest Entertainer" for nothing. Today the film may seem a bit over-sentimental, but it certainly played well to a crowd that made Jolson the right man at the right time to give sound film a push forward with his voice. Jolson's performances in blackface makeup are considered dated and viewed as implicit racism now, but it should be noted that Jolson himself fought against discrimination for African Americans when it came to Broadway productions. He has a complex legacy, but he should still be celebrated for the things that he did that aren't dated to time. The other actors do just fine, including Besserer when it comes to her key scene: a dialogue with her on-screen son, brief yet necessary to everything that followed in the next decade. The film as a whole is okay, holding together on the strength of Jolson's charisma with songs more than its family drama, but one can still find appreciation for what goes on screen without becoming bored in its 89 minute run-time (not including the seven minutes of overture and exit music that open and close the film, respectively) for too long. It is a film that holds to the traditions of the past in several ways that also looks to the future, with this being a key step in the evolution for filmmaking. It won an Honorary Academy Award for its studio and production chief Darryl F. Zanuck (who would become a prominent studio figure in his own right in the following decades), "for producing The Jazz Singer, the pioneer outstanding talking picture, which has revolutionized the industry". The film has been remade three times, having been done in 1952 (with Danny Thomas), 1959 (a TV adaptation with Jerry Lewis), and 1980 (with Neil Diamond). In any case, this is a fairly decent film that endures for its historical value alongside an alright foundation of actors and songs that helped in starting the tide for sound and songs for film.

Overall, I give it 7 out of 10 stars.

June 9, 2014

Movie Night: Wizard of Oz.


Review #589: Wizard of Oz.

Cast
Larry Semon (Scarecrow/Toymaker/Farmhand), Dorothy Dwan (Dorothy/Princess Dorothea), Bryant Washburn (Kynd), Oliver Hardy (Woodsman/Knight of the Garter/Farmhand), Josef Swickard (Prime Minister Kruel), Charles Murray (Wizard of Oz), Spencer Bell (Cowardly Lion/Rastus/Snowball), Frank Alexander (Uncle Henry/Prince of Whales), Otto Lederer (Ambassador Wikked), and Mary Carr (Aunt Em) Directed by Larry Semon.

Review
There was an earlier version of the Wizard of Oz? Yes, there was. Tons in fact. This isn't even the first one, there are other silent versions before this, all (loosely) adapted from the original novel by L. Frank Baum. This movie has the distinction of being written by (supposedly) L. Frank Baum, Jr and Larry Semon, who practically steals the show in this movie. And that's the problem considering this isn't the Scarecrow of Oz, it's the Wizard of Oz. Dorothy barely gets any screen time, especially in the last 40 minutes, when the movie is taken over fully by Semon, and occasionally Bell, who gets some moments, only for it to cut back to Semon, though I guess being the director means getting the opportunity to be in every scene. It wouldn't be as grating if the movie didn't pad itself by just not going anywhere, taking forever to begin the movie and taking forever to end the movie. It takes so long to get to Oz (again), and we're stuck watching slapstick over and over again. It's fun the first time, but it gets old really fast. The actors aren't bad, and if you look hard enough, you'll find Oliver Hardy, before he would gain fame as part of the duo Laurel and Hardy. The characters in this movie are bizarre in their actions, especially Hardy's character. The movie at least is colorful with the hues and the music is decent, but this is still a weird movie. You haven't lived life until you've seen a man flying through the air running away from lightening...and then he climbs into a house. Weird movies can be good, this is not. The setup for the movie by use of a toymaker narrator is either an odd way to setup the movie or just a lazy way. It could be both, given the nonsensical ending that leaves no proper conclusion. It's no wonder why this was a big failure (even bankrupting the studio), the movie is just not that good, and it suffers even more when compared to the more famous 1939 film, which knocks this right off the block. I'd recommend Return to Oz before I recommend this, at least the former is sensible. This is just a sad mess that can't comprehend itself.

Overall, I give it 4 out of 10 stars.