Showing posts with label Russell Rouse. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Russell Rouse. Show all posts

September 21, 2024

The Thief (1952).

Review #2254: The Thief (1952)

Cast: 
Ray Milland (Allan Fields), Martin Gabel (Mr. Bleek), Harry Bronson (Harris), Rita Vale (Miss Philips), Rex O'Malley (Beal), and Rita Gam (the Girl) Directed by Russell Rouse (#549 - The Oscar)

Review: 
I'm sure you haven't heard of this film before, unless of course you admire old films or happen to admire bad puns when writing opening sentences for reviews. That is because this is a film where, well, no dialogue is spoken the whole way through, complete with the smallest possible use of verbal communication possible: seeing a telegram message (there is sound of course). It is basically a test to see how much one can get out of an actor, and a former Academy Award winner in Milland seems apt here. The film was written by Clarence Greene and Russell Rouse, who had written a handful of films together since The Town Went Wild (1944). Most notably, they co-wrote D.O.A. (1950) and the story for Pillow Talk (1959), with the latter resulting in an Academy Award. Rouse had rose up all the way from props (and a background related in film from his father and great uncle), and The Thief would be the second of ten features he directed from 1951 (The Well was first, which he co-directed with Leo C. Popkin to considerable notice) to 1967; Greene either co-wrote or produced all of Rouse's films. Rouse continued to write until a few years before his death in 1987 at the age of 73.
 
Really this is the kind of movie where using your imagination might help with a film as strangely involving as this one is. Dwelling in the shadows of fear where a man is alone is interesting when you don't know the motives behind such things for a strange 86 minutes. I suppose it is important to make a movie that show the methods of work as one that isn't so much about action or wordplay but instead wordless grind that can and will turn one inside out. Imagine a movie where one can see some legs in a film that really does go to show that actions speak louder than words. In that sense, Milland is up to the challenge, one filled with weary dread for the business that he has signed himself. The guilt for where his responsibilities now lie is a palpable one that especially leads one to imagine where we would be in his shoes. It isn't exactly a blank slate, but I think you can see where films like Silent Night (2023) found interesting inspiration to try and mold something with weary (silent) abandon. Gabel simply just has to stare in the manner that arises from men in shadows that have no use for fear or heavies when procedure is enough. This is a film for those that would like to see just what makes a clock tick beyond just sounds. Sure, there are moments that seem to contort to follow the rules it sets for itself, but it doesn't hurt it completely when one thinks about low-budget cheapies that either made up their own rules or went with the flow (or alternatively, improvisation). The ending of the film is probably predictable for the era it was made (take a guess where a guy taking photos for "the enemy" is going to end up beyond either jail or death), but it doesn't detract from the overall achievement of the film in curiosity.

Overall, I give it 7 out of 10 stars.

February 27, 2014

Movie Night: The Oscar.


Review #549: The Oscar.

Cast
Stephen Boyd (Frankie Fane), Elke Sommer (Kay Bergdahl), Milton Berle (Alfred Kapstetter), Eleanor Parker (Sophie Cantaro), Joseph Cotten (Kenneth H. Regan), Jill St. John (Laurel Scott), Tony Bennett (Kelly), Edie Adams (Trina Yale), and Ernest Borgnine (Barney Yale) Directed by Russell Rouse.

Review
In honor of the 86th Academy Awards this Sunday, I decided to review a movie with many stars (some of which who won Oscars before this movie), many cameos...and a big ego. The movie is billed as a drama, when it really is an unintentional comedy that goes so over the top in trying to be a drama, that it becomes laughable. The main problem of the movie is the unlikable characters. Aside from the main character, there are no characters to root for, none to actually feel for nor care about, and while it could be argued that there are films with unlikable characters that are actually good, this is not one of them. This is a movie that decays from beginning to end, a movie that tries to disguise its faults with cameos, basically trying to plug a hole with a band-aid. Tony Bennett is bad (one might say inept is a better term, but let's be fair, this was his film debut and consequently his only dramatic role), but with the lines (Example: "I was running out of numbers! He used 'em like Kleenex! Once, and threw 'em away!") he has to say, I can't blame him. The movie is bloated in length, self-indulgent in style, and an overall mess that almost is so bad, it's good, until it goes back into so bad, it's bad. I'd stick to the "The Nobel" by SCTV instead. Whatever you may think of the Oscars, this is a definite skip it.

Overall, I give it 3 out of 10 stars.